Friday, 30 March 2007

The Irresistible Cane Toads (Conquerers of the Outback).

Cane Toads Are Big Predators The Problem: The Cane Toad (Bufo Marinus) is Australia’s greatest ever threat to native fauna since man arrived.

The History: Introduced as a pest control in the sugar cane fields in the 1930’s it spread quickly and finding no predators, has now reached approx 200 million spread over Northern Australia, and because the are
  • Very poisonous (they have a toxic skin), and kill predators that eat or bite them, and
  • Voracious predators and will eat anything that they can get their mouths round e.g. Small mammals, insects, fish, Chihuahuas etc etc.
  • The breed like hell, and with no predators the young survive in massive numbers.
 
They are a very real threat to native species diversity. They have few predators in their native Hawaii and are controlled by illness, rather than Hawaiians species. Introducing new bacteria’s would be risky and in any case their range is too great now.

Cane Toad Invasion Of AustraliaRecent projections (which currently exclude Global Warming effects) show that their range could double in the next few decades, and so far there has been no successful method devised to counteract this spread.

Nature fights back:

There is some evidence that some species are showing increased toleration of the toxin in small amounts and that natural selection is favouring predators that can’t attack the larger Toads. E.g. Smaller mouth sizes on snakes. They can survive biting smaller Cane Toads.

However this is very slow, not proven and reversing millennium of adaptation to normal conditions so may still result in the wipe out of the native species.

Possible Controls:

Poisoning: Obviously this would also kill native species of amphibian and other creatures – would only be possible if the Cane Toad has wiped out all native life anyway. This is the drastic solution.

Introducing a Predator: As this is how the problem originally started it’s not likely to be adopted, especially as there are no suitable candidates around.

Genetic Engineering: This takes two possible forms:
  1. Genetically altering predator species to withstand the poisonous toxins of the Cane Toads skins – Dr Thomas Madsen believes he has found the gene that confers resistance to toad toxin, and is advocating the idea of creating toad resistant Quolls, Goannas (Small rodents and Lizards etc).
  2. Genetically altering the Cane Toads to only produce “male” toads. The hope being that over a few years they would breed themselves out of existence. Professor Peter Koopman, from The University of Queensland’s Institute for Molecular Bioscience, is developing a strain of “daughter less” cane toads - toads that can give birth only to sons.“We hope to transplant a ‘gene’ into toads that will cause any female tadpoles they produce to change course and become males,” he said. “All of the offspring of this genetically engineered toad would thus be male, and they would all be carrying the daughter less gene. "It’s probably the greenest and safest solution to manage the cane toad problem – it doesn’t involve any toxins or pathogens, so the toads cannot develop immunity against it, and there is no risk to native frog species that we want to protect.”
This “Magic Bullet” approach has its critics, in that it is not proven, and very expensive to develop, and slow to deploy. It also raises concerns about genetic diversity. If you made a Goanna that could eat toads, it would be so successful relative to all other Goanna's that its genes would be the only ones left in the population after a while. The problem with this is that then you have a population of very close relatives (inbreeding etc) which leaves the population open to later threats like disease.

These objections could maybe be tackled by;
  • Taking as wide a range of subjects for manipulation as possible from the wild population (reintroduced into the areas they were taken from), to ensure that the successful pools were still as diverse as before, but shared that one altered gene, along with the hundreds that they must already share in common (or they wouldn't be 'Quolls' in the first place if you follow my drift).
  • A limited introduction from external wild sources (after the toads have gone). They may not be entirely similar to the native versions but better than nothing and would introduce diversity.
  • A controlled release of some captive stock (I am aware that these stocks have often been manipulated by breeders, so this really would have to be controlled e.g. aggressive males are a good wild breeding trait, but have been bred out of captive stocks etc). However there are reserve wild stocks being set up that could assist in this.
Some humans are taking matters into their own hands, by organizing sweeps for Cane Toads and manually killing them. However, as the toads out number the humans by 5 to 1, and rising, this a somewhat problematic approach.

So far nothing has been deployed that has had any real effect, and until it is, the inexorable rise of the Cane Toad continues unchecked by human efforts to control them.
 
Movie Link:
Cane Toads eating habits.

2 comments:

  1. G'Day

    These suckers are everywhere, especially during the mating season. Running them over in a truck brings down the numbers!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. This isn't a reply to a post comment that I am sure isn't from a real Australian 'G'Day' indeed!!

      Its an Update:

      There is a promising development that may help tackle a number of invader species: Gene-Editing via CRISPR technology has allowed scientists "Gene drives".

      The DNA introduced into the invader species often makes one sex infertile and with the added safety switch off gene that can be added its been suggested as a solution to Cane Toads, in Australia, Grey Squirrels in the UK, and even Mosquitoes.

      Delete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.