Saturday, 9 February 2008

Anglican decline accelerates

Not even a month after the fat vicar had a swipe at me for supporting the Bishop who said that Islam was a threat to our way of life, the Archbishop of Canterbury comes clean and suggests that we introduce 'elements of Sharia Law' into the UK, so that the Muslims who can't stand us, or our non Muslim ways, can pretend they live in one of the many Muslim paradise states that dot the globe, err hang on, they are all poverty ridden uneducated hell holes, especially for non-muslims.

Islamic Laws Ushered In By Protestant Clergy?

Oops it must be some other reason why they would want to introduce Sharia law into the UK, Women and Gays rights maybe?

Of course he is now shocked at the utter contempt with which many have greeted his suggestion, especially the Homosexual and women's groups in his Church of any values, who know exactly what happens to women and homosexuals under the kind ministrations of the Mullahs.

Of course, after being attacked, the Archbishop has defended himself, but the fact is that he has mentally surrendered to the idea that Islam is the coming religion (well in place of the dead protestant religion in the UK), and his defenders think his treatment is 'disgraceful', but maybe he should have thought out his position before making such an announcement.

Not doubt the fat vicar will have an opposite view to mine, so take a peek and see what the opposite opinion is, it may well be the harbinger of the future Islamic UK, ushered in by the discredited ministers of the collapsed Christianity. I am guessing that he will treat any critics of Islam as 'ill informed', or 'uneducated', or some such dismissive statement, meaning 'not holding the opinions of the vicar'. It's how he treats any opinion that he doesn't personally hold to be true, an oddly 'unchristian' stance, but then again maybe not so odd, for a defender of Islamic values.

Of course there are a number of views being expressed, and not all are hostile, but the majority are, and even many Muslims are unhappy, presumably because they have first hand experience of letting some man with a wild beard (and I don't just mean an Anglican Archbishop), deciding your future.

***************************************
This post is from the site No PC Views. if you are viewing it elsewhere, then it has been scraped or stolen. You may wish to view the post in its original context by visiting No PC Views (http://no-pc.blogspot.co.uk/)

4 comments:

  1. You were right, the Vicar's blog has the statements "not noted it has to be said for her particularly informed coverage of Muslim affairs" and "Favourite 'uninformed' coverage comes from the Sun's blogs with the headline:"

    He just dismisses as uninformed any opinion that he doesn't like. He has not got a real job, and is paid to spout superstitious crap, but the thoughts of other people, who have to think before they speak out, are 'uninformed'.

    Arrogant twat!

    ReplyDelete
  2. I don't bother reading his site, because I think he is an utter PC idiot, who should be given a good slapping, so I will take your quotes as being correct.

    I link to his site automatically because I know that he takes the PC stance on everything, and as he brought himself to my attention, he deserves to be my thermometer of the kind of uninformed' superstitious PC opinions not to hold LOL!

    Funny that he apparently believes in womens rights, gay rights and every other minority right, but is also apparently (according to your comment), supporting the Archbishops Sharia opinion ... surely the two sets of rights are in opposition or maybe I am just uninformed' about the hanging of women and homosexuals in Sharia Iran?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ironically the rise of Islam may well be the straw that breaks the PC 'Camels back'. The fear that Islam now engenders in the non muslim, is driving very firm non PC opinions about what is needed to get rid of the threat.

    The PC brigades continued insistence that, in the face of all the evidence to the contrary, Islam is a "religion of peace" and the madmen who run it (including those who trained the twelve year old suicide bomber that we now have living in the UK - http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/34470/Suicide-bomber-12-at-UK-school -) are actually "jolly decent liberal chaps once you get to know them" is now increasingly falling on angry ears.

    Maybe its because of stories like this "Taliban hanged boy, 12, for spying for UK" - http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/12/09/wafg409.xml

    Britain and the West don't have to 'come to terms' with Islam unless we want to, we could just expel the Muslims, as they would do to us in similar circumstances, except it would be with forced conversions as well.

    This continuing demand that we change to accomodate Islamic values and laws is the reason why the Anglican church is merely a twitching corpse of a christian church.

    I noticed that the Latin American and African anglican churches have attacked the Archbishops comments as well, so another nail in the coffin of the "Worldwide Anglican Communion"

    Dr Rowan may well be the last Archbishop of the united church and Britains Anglican rump will disappear up its own fundamentals, or lack of them.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I have just posted another blog on the juristic brilliance of the Sahria courts .... old woman to be beheaded as a witch!

    ReplyDelete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.