Sunday, 1 February 2009

"Free Speech" Not A UN Concern Anymore

When the UN was set up by civilised nations, it included in its areas of interest, the right of "free speech" via the Universal Declaration of Human Rights ....

Declaration Of Human Rights
Declaration Of Human Rights

 .... which stated 60 years ago, that "a world in which human beings shall enjoy freedom of speech and belief is the highest aspiration of the common people"... this was to be reported on by a UN "Rapporteur."

Currently Ambeyi Ligabo is the UN Rapporteur for 'Freedom of Opinion', and Asma Jahangir is responsible for 'Expression and Freedom of Religion or Belief'. There are a number of 'Human Rights Defenders', with Margaret Sekaggya apparently the principle defender of our basic human rights.

Columnist Johann Hari in the Independent Newspaper has brought to his readers attention changes at the United Nations that affect Free Speech defence. These are that following pressure from Islamic countries, who, led by the freedom loving Saudis, said that any demand for 'everyone to be able to think and speak freely' failed to "respect" the "unique sensitivities" of the religious (i.e. Muslims), so they have issued an alternative, Declaration of Human Rights in Islam . Note that 'the religious' can only mean "Islamic" in the declaration.

In this Anti Free Speech declaration you can only speak within "the limits set by the shariah [Muslim law]. It is not permitted to spread falsehood or disseminate that which involves encouraging abomination or forsaking the Islamic community". In other words, if you say you are not a Muslim, or declare that Islam is wrong in anyway, in any part of the world, you are subject to Sharia Law, and will be subject to UN condemnation, and a lot worse if you happen to be in a Muslim country.

The Islamic inspired declaration goes on to make it clear that there is no equality for women, gays, non-Muslims, or apostates. To their eternal shame this Muslim led attack on human principles has been backed by both the Vatican, and a collection of US Christian fundamentalists.

Now the Pakistani delegate to the UN has demanded that this job description be changed, so they can seek out and condemn "abuses of free expression" including "defamation of religions and prophets". Shamefully the UN council has agreed to the Pakistani demand and now, instead of condemning the people who wanted to murder Salman Rushdie, they will be condemning Salman Rushdie himself ..... where were the major western powers when Free Speech was finally abandoned as a Human aspiration?

Apparently they agreed to this change without complaint. The main objections have come from free speech campaigners such as Roy Brown of the International Humanist and Ethical Union, who has tried to raise topics like the stoning of women accused of adultery or child marriage.

When Mr Brown tried to speak to the UN, the Egyptian delegate stood up to announce that any discussion of shariah "will not happen" and "Islam will not be crucified in this council" – and Mr Brown was ordered to stop talking by the UN Commission on Human Rights, which is controlled by the Muslim state membership, and therefore any criticism of Islamic practices has therefore effectively been gagged.

Now mullahs and despotic regimes have the UN backing for the imprisonment of people like Abdel Kareem Soliman who said that the al-Azhar university in Cairo was a "the university of terrorism", and that it "suppressed free thought".

I point also to the treatment of writer Taslima Nasreen, firstly in Bangladesh and then in West Bengal by Muslim zealots. Her crime? She had "seriously hurt Muslim sentiments" by calling for more rights for women in her writings.

When she called for Islamic religious edicts to be changed, she was referring to the Sharia laws (which are man made and biased against women), but that didn't stop an illiterate rent-a-mob being drummed out of the mosques, by Mullahs who probably had never read the books, to destroy property, burn and loot in the name of 'protecting the honour' of their religion .... now the actions of this mob is apparently UN sanctioned.

Recently Reda Abdel-Rahman (also known as Abdel Rahman) was arrested, tortured and humiliated in Egypt. His crime "contempt for the Muslim faith" which in reality, is, that he accepts the Quran as the only source of the Muslim religion, and not the Sunnah (the life of Mohammad, which is where child brides and various other practices from Islam are justified).

In fact the Quran says that no other book should be used so Mr Rahman is correct, and the other Muslims are apostates by using the books of the Sunnah. That aside, the UN no longer comments on the Egyptian governments abuses as long as they say its a 'religious matter'.

I truly believe that we have gone mad ......

5 comments:

  1. It's no surprise that the UK backed this change, after all didn't the Labour Party propose much the same laws for the UK, until a comedian shamed them into dropping the legislation?

    However its a shock to realise that apparently the US, and other countries with strong free speech readitions such as Australia & Canada, have apparently also agreed it.

    Maybe theres a misunderstanding here, I have looked at your links, which appear to confirm this blog, but its hard to find any other news organisation picking up the story?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Actually I have now looked at this story again and can find precious little to support the changes suggested in my primary source.

    I will consider if this blog needs amending or withdrawing.

    ReplyDelete
  3. If anyone can show that this story is wrong in its mani premise about the UN, I will tag on an apology and explanation.

    Please post a link etc to allow me to confirm the error.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Ah Ha! Christopher Hitchens a New York Times syndicated columnist has just written about this same story in the NYT and UK's Sunday Express (comment).

    Under a column titled "Now Muslims are saying its illegal to critise Islam" he confirms the story that I highlighted on the first of February.

    He says its 'Non binding UN Resolution 62/154 on "combating defamation of religions (aka islam)". He details the contents of the 'resolution' and confirms that Pakistan are the 'sponsers' .... I therefore am satisified that not only is the story correct, but that I beat a syndicated political columnist by over a month!!

    I will post a link if the Hitchens story turns up on the web in the next week or so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. As promised, a link to confirm that the UN really has voted to make it illegal to criticise Islam..... who's that knocking at my front door?

    ReplyDelete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.