Saturday, 29 August 2009

"A Perfect Storm"

This blog has frequently pointed to the confluence of events that may well precipitate profound changes in the human races existence on the planet, and even life itself ..... we have predicted 2050 AD as the moment of the disasters but more and more evidence suggests that there will be a major problem around 2030 AD which we have discussed. This week, the March predictions of UK chief scientist John Beddington, which described what he called a "A Perfect Storm" of food, energy and water shortages, unless the world changes its ways, arising as early as 2030 AD, have made the main news again, with some discussion on what to do. This is all population driven, and yet even now we talk around this subject, because too many on the 'PC Left' consider it "Racist" to suggest that the Middle East, Asia and Africa need to curb their population growth now. This is doubly so, because so many of these left wingers have a vested employment interests in the work of charities, NGO's and Inter governmental agencies which promote more, not less children in the Third World, but with no attempt to curb the birth rates.

Predicted World Population Growth

In the Middle East, no attempt has ever been made to cut birth rates of 10 or more children, especially amongst the poor and ill educated. There are several populations with very high population growth rates, such as those of Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt, or the United Arab Emirates. Its been pointed out that Iran is a notable exception to the regional trends.

In the sub continent, only Mrs Indira Gandhi ever tried any forceful birth control measures (and she was assassinated). Despite some evidence that birth rates are falling in India, it appears that she is still likely to overtake China in population levels by 2050 AD.

Pakistan is on a track of mass population growth (which should worry the UK), and is expected to go through the roof. In 1950 Pakistan had a population of about 40 million people. Since then it has more than tripled and stood at 136 million in 1995. But because the country not only has a very young population, but also still an extremely high fertility rate (much higher, for instance, than in Bangladesh or Thailand), its predicted that Pakistan's population will be about 357 million by 2050 AD.

The Chinese have practised a one child policy for decades (with some success), but recently they have relaxed it to two children to stabilise the population and to get rid of the male orientated population that the one child policy produced.

Sub Saharan Africa has no birth rate policies, and Nigeria is predicted to have grown from a population in 1950 of about 33 million to about 112 million now. The UN predicts that between 1995 and the year 2050 the country's population will probably triple again and reach almost 339 million ..... a ten fold increase in less than a century.

By 2050 AD a much bigger share of the world population will live in Africa South of the Sahara. In only some 50 years Western Africa, for instance, will have the same population as all of Europe. Eastern Africa will have many more people than all the countries of South America, the Caribbean and Oceania combined.

So we face an unprecedented population explosion, and no resources to feed them .... the US survivalists may be on to something.

3 comments:

  1. You're wrong about Iran having a high population growth rate.
    See here:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_planning_in_Iran

    ReplyDelete
  2. What about the United States? Check out the welfare births to illiterate unmotivated parents who continue the cycle of 'have as many kids as you can to get more welfare'. Not a judgment, it's what I have watched happen here in Louisiana for the past twenty + years. I'm sure it's not just the Southern states that are creating this problem. Why is it that we are so apt to look at what other countries are doing and not even notice what's happening in our own back yard?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thanks for the comments (both of you?), and I have amended the post, to correct the factually incorrect reference to Iran. Just shows that I should check every fact, and not make an assumption.

    As for the internal demographics in each country, there will be areas where growth outstrips the general trends. In the Middle East and Asia etc, higher birth rates than the high national rates, are usually linked to poor education (especially amongst women).

    In the West, in European countries, these population hotspots usually include third world immigrant areas such as Africans and Muslims.

    In the UK, the sink hole housing estates, where welfare benefits, are the major income stream outside of drug dealing, there is considerable anecdotal evidence, that the birth rates are higher than the better educated general population.

    I don't have figures for the US, but I assume from the second comment above, that the author is confirming that in the US the 'underclass' have substantially higher birth rates than the main stream population.

    Again, I suspect that apart from the welfare advantages, this is also linked to poor educational attainments in the communities.

    Whilst the US is in a better position than Europe when it comes to the massing of the poor on its borders, it still will be affected by the coming problems. Mexico is a problem by itself, and also a conduit for south american refugees.

    I am hopeful that I won't be around when it happens, because being elderly when the world goes mad, will not be good.

    Still, who knows we may come to our senses and take preparations, but I won't hold my breath ;-)

    ReplyDelete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.