Monday, 14 December 2009

Another Foot In Another Bishops Mouth

Once the Church of England (CoE) gets going, it can't stop sticking its collective foot in its mouth.

Rowan Williams Supported Sharia Law
Rowan Williams

Last year Rowan Williams suggested that elements of Sharia Law should be incorporated into UK law, and got slated into an apology. Now the Reverand Stephen Venner, the Church of England’s new Bishop to the Forces to the armed forces has had to apologise over comments he made in the Daily Telegraph about how the Taliban could be admired for their "conviction to their faith".

I can well imagine how some elements of the Taliban beliefs, such as their unswerving belief in a violent and backward religion, could look attractive to some members of the lily-livered CoE, but suggesting that elements of Sharia law, or admiring the strength of Muslims belief in that system, just seems to highlight the weakness of current Protestant Christian beliefs.

Oh, and just in case he has forgotten, the Taliban also believe in much the same thing as the general Muslim population of the area (but without the 'liberalism' on girls education). This Poll undertaken in Pakistan this year shows 83% support for Stoning Adulterers, 80% support whipping / cutting off hands for thieves, 78% support the Death penalty for leaving (or denying Islam), and 71% support Sharia Law (with religious judges).

Pakistan Opinion poll (13/08/09)

Pakistan Poll 2009
Pakistan Poll 2009

This includes a very firm way of handling the "Gay Bishop's" issue once and for all (with the application of some old time religion followed by death), which would not be popular with the liberal wing of the C of E.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.