What can you say when a public servant, who's primary aim should be the protection of the public from dangerous convicted criminals, makes the complaint that 'society is too "risk-averse" to allow 'life term' prisoners to be released early from jail'.
What sort of idiot, apparently believes that the public should be prepared to take risks and let so called 'lifers' i.e. murderers, serial rapists, ever dangerous paedophiles etc out on the street early?
Well the UK Parole Board chairman Sir David Latham, is named in the story as stating that the drop in the proportion of 'life-term' inmates who were freed was an "over-reaction" According to the story, over the past five years, the proportion of life sentence prisoners who have successfully applied for release has dropped from about 35% to 15%. Sir David said this was an "over-reaction" when re-offending rates had remained stable at between 1% and 2%.
He raised the prospect that his interview would be "distorted" by the press but said an open debate on the issue was needed ..... it almost beggars belief that someone in his position wants 'life-term' prisoners released faster. I would have thought that 35% was far too high, and that something between 5 -10% would be more in line with what we as a public want let out,
What's worse, is the irony that these released prisoners are described as 'life-term' inmates, when they patently are not .... its part of the great liberal con played on the rest of us, that we continue to describe fixed term sentences as 'life', when they are patently not, else I wouldn't have a story to blog on.
Friday, 2 April 2010
2 comments:
All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.
Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.
Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.
Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.
Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.
A re-offending rate of only 1-2%?? Oh, I don't think so. Someone is playing fast and loose with the statistics and the reporting. Most criminals have no desire to reform. Plus, sex crimes are a compulsive and chronic disorder.
ReplyDeleteTend to agree with you .... my personal opinion is that 'life should mean life' .... anything else is a judicial lie to make the British public think we have life sentences.
ReplyDelete