Saturday, 26 March 2011

A Culture Of Denial

This Blog has remarked in the past on the supine acceptance by women commentators in the UK, of what creeping Islamization and the introduction of Sharia, in any form, could mean for the women of the UK, and indeed Europe.

The "Wimmin" of the Left, who don't hold back in their vilification of any perceived form of "Sexism" by "White Males" ... say nothing, while some men who are largely of Pakistani descent, carry out a series of activities (under the guise of "freedom of speech, multiculturalism, and 'Human rights') ... that are contrary to, and  in many instances working actively against, all the value systems that have given Western women, the most freedom, rights and safety, of any women, at any time in human history.

So it was with no great surprise that I read and then followed, the fallout from the story of the mass sexual assault and beating, of US female reporter Lara Logan in Egypt's Tahrir square.


The first thing that struck me, was the silence, the incredible long silence. Instead of a condemnation of the attack on one of their own, by the men of a culture, that has a history of violence to, and subjugation of, women and their rights, and which is on the rise in the UK and elsewhere, there was simply embarrassed silence. There was no radio or TV debate on how or why this could happen in any culture, nor whether the attempts to appease this same culture in the West, needs to be reconsidered.

Now it should be pointed out that sexual harassment of women in public places, is not solely the preserve of Muslim / Arab societies - and indeed it wasn't so very long ago that it was an issue in the West, albeit, it was not usually at the level of anything more than propositioning women, or verbal comments ....

  • Public sexual harassment known as "eve teasing" in India.
  • In the US, 'Reclaim the Night' campaign started in the 1970s with marches against sexual violence and pornography.
  • In Japan, groping on the subway has been a problem for many years.
  • In Pakistan, and other Asian countries, Christian and Hindu girls are occasionally kidnapped, raped and then forced to marry their Muslim rapist by Sharia courts.
  • Many African conflicts are characterised by mass rape of women as a part of the armed struggles.

However the mass sexual assault on reporter Lara Logan, and other incidents in that part of the world, have highlighted the particularly public, nasty, violent and gang rape element of any such events in the Islamic world.

The other thing that followed this terrible event, and that was a surprise, was the vitriol poured down on the head of Ms Logan by commentators of the Left and Right, who fearful of any Muslim response to criticism of their culture, and of the violence to women that it engenders, turned instead  on the messenger of their discomfort.

At first, there was the attempt to De-Muslimise the event by suggesting that all men everywhere are sexual predators and therefore by inference that mass. two hundred strong gangs of rapists are capable of springing up in every culture ...

Then there was the suggestion that being a woman reporter was somehow "asking for it" in many parts of the world and therefore, the risk of being publicly gang raped and beaten to death was just one of the risks a woman took ..... just like the risk of being shot, or tortured.

But when that didn't run, they simply attacked Ms Logan (in a move which is remarkably similar, in a symbolic way, to an an 'honour killing') for causing the attack by 'being there'. The attack took the form of  a media onslaught, rife with the typical blame-the-victim accusations (ironically like the rape victim as instigator in Muslim honor killings), many from other journalists and commentators.

Perhaps the worst of these attacks was led by left-wing journalist Nir Rosen, who had also worked in the war zones of Iraq and Afghanistan, and who started a series of tweets which began with: "[She] was probably just groped like thousands of other women", continued with: "Lara had to outdo Anderson" [referring to the attack on CNN's reporter Anderson Cooper and his crew the day before], and ended with: "Jesus Christ, at a moment when she is going to become a martyr and glorified we should at least remember her role as a major warmonger."

He tried to back-track, as the exact nature of the attack on her, and the nastiness of his tweet attack, went viral, but denials that he really understood the nature of the attack on her rang as a bit hollow, as he had posted his initial tweet on the CBS statement about her injuries, and the details of the attack. He then reverted to the "some of my best friends are ....." type of defence with the statement that he was a "staunch supporter of women's rights". He was eventually forced him to resign from his position at New York University.

But it wasn't just from the 'Left' that Logan was attacked .... Ultra-conservative columnist, and female commentator Debbie Schlussel stated that: "Lara Logan was among the chief cheerleaders of this 'revolution' by animals. Now she knows what Islamic revolution is really all about." She then said that it was "So sad, too bad, Lara. No-one told her to go there. She knew the risks. And she should have known what Islam is all about. Now she knows ... How fitting that Lara Logan was 'liberated' by Muslims in Liberation Square while she was gushing over the other part of the 'liberation'. Hope you're enjoying the revolution, Lara! Alhamdilllullah [praise Allah]."

I find it strange and sad, that fear of reprisals if making negative comments about one foreign culture, makes us attack those who should be defended by our own one ..... strange days.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.