Saturday, 23 July 2011

False Assumptions

When news of the terrible events in Norway started to trickle out, I like many others assumed that this was yet another in the long line of Islamic terrorist attacks, another '7/7 or 9/11'.

The Holiday Island Of Utoeya
The Holiday Island Of Utoeya

But we were all wrong, and the attack on the holiday island and government buildings were all carried out by a 32-year-old Norwegian man, Anders Behring Breivik, and the police have charged him over both attacks (he apparently has freely admitted carrying them out). His 'Twitter' account only had one quote "One person with a belief is equal to the force of 100,000 who have only interests."

He is apparently a body-building 'Anti Islamic, Nationalist', and has a particular gripe over what he thought was the pro 'Islamic' immigration stance of the 'Norwegian Labour Party', outside whose offices he planted the bomb. The Norwegian Labour Party also own the island of Utoeya, and its one of their youth rallies, at which the Socialist Prime Minister was due to speak, that he so bloodily attacked.  He faces a maximum of just twenty one years imprisonment for this mass murder in liberal Norway .... doesn't seem enough. Timothy McVeigh, the Oklahoma City Bomber who shares a similar profile, was executed for his crimes. 

So rather than '7/7 or 9/11', it turns out to be more like 'Oklahoma City' with eighty four or more people killed on the island of Utoeya, and at least seven in the Oslo bombing.

Apart from the tragedy of the story, its also a lesson in the psychology of jumping to conclusions before the facts emerge.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.