In Kuwait, the country that we trashed Iraq for in order to defend it as a bastion of rationality and liberal values (well they have oil and US President Bush was a friend of the ruling family) .....
... there has been another bout of modernism.
 | |
| Kuwaiti MPs Osama al-Shahin (L) and Shaaya al-Shaaya arrive hand-in-hand to attend a Parliament session. Nice. |
... there has been another bout of modernism.
Yes they have legislated on the use of social media such as Facebook, and Twitter.
Of course, Kuwait being part of the Muslim enlightenment, this
legislation has a twist on it that we in less liberal countries might
not have expected.
So rather than some 'anti account fraud' or
'anti-trolling' laws, they decided that defending their prophet, and
Sunni rulers was the priority. So naturally the first the rest of us hear about this move into 21st century legislation is when one Hamad al-Naqi is convicted, and then sentenced to 10 years in prison for endangering state security, by insulting the Prophet Muhammad and the rulers of Saudi Arabia and Bahrain in messages on Twitter.
Just to ensure that he stayed well buried in prison, he was also found guilty of 'mocking Islam', and provoking sectarian tensions. Needless to say he is a Shia Muslim, and all these states are ruled by Sunni dynasties .... but that's just a coincidence, because with about a third of Kuwait's 1.1 million citizens being Shia, there can't be any discrimination, can there?
Mr al-Naqi, or rather his lawyer, is now claiming the tried and tested defence of "My account was hacked" .... which suggests that he or his lawyer is rather more I.T. savvy than the legislators, but that might count against him, as its likely that these law makers won't actually understand what this defence means.
When questioned about the severity of these sentences, the Kuwaitis pointed out that as many Sunni hard-liners had demanded the death penalty for alleged blasphemy, but he had only got 10yrs, that proved that they were being progressive and liberal in only giving him such a 'light sentence'.
In fact it later came to light that he was lucky to have been charged when he was, because they have since amended the law once again to stipulate that capital punishment applies to any Muslim who, through any form of expression, insults God, his prophets, messengers, the Prophet Muhammad's wives or the Koran, unless the defendant publicly repents. If the defendant repents, a sentence of at least five years' imprisonment will be imposed. Repeat offenders will receive the death sentence.
Aren't we glad that we started the first of a major series of wars, that have since cost untold hundreds of thousands of lives across first Kuwait, and then Iraq, then Afghanistan, and then Iraq again, initially just to defend the 'liberal' oil Sheiks of Kuwait.
Mr al-Naqi, or rather his lawyer, is now claiming the tried and tested defence of "My account was hacked" .... which suggests that he or his lawyer is rather more I.T. savvy than the legislators, but that might count against him, as its likely that these law makers won't actually understand what this defence means.
When questioned about the severity of these sentences, the Kuwaitis pointed out that as many Sunni hard-liners had demanded the death penalty for alleged blasphemy, but he had only got 10yrs, that proved that they were being progressive and liberal in only giving him such a 'light sentence'.
In fact it later came to light that he was lucky to have been charged when he was, because they have since amended the law once again to stipulate that capital punishment applies to any Muslim who, through any form of expression, insults God, his prophets, messengers, the Prophet Muhammad's wives or the Koran, unless the defendant publicly repents. If the defendant repents, a sentence of at least five years' imprisonment will be imposed. Repeat offenders will receive the death sentence.
Aren't we glad that we started the first of a major series of wars, that have since cost untold hundreds of thousands of lives across first Kuwait, and then Iraq, then Afghanistan, and then Iraq again, initially just to defend the 'liberal' oil Sheiks of Kuwait.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.
Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.
Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.
Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.
Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.