Friday, 3 October 2014

Political or Religious Differences

What a strange and deeply disturbing justice system Britain has developed ...
 
Rapist Animals - But Not Racists According To The Crown Prosecution Service.
Rapist Animals - But not racists according to crown prosecution service.

Pakistani men can form gangs, rape, drug beat up and threaten thousands of white girls in just one town ~ with grave suspicions that this is just the tip of the iceberg (if other convictions for similar crimes are a hint of what's been happening). Media stories suggest  Muslim child rapists are due to be arrested in Greater Manchester, but they get sentences as low as 4 years for crimes, for which a white or black male would get life for, partly because the Crown Prosecution Service refuse to charge them with racial and religiously motivated crimes, despite the overwhelming evidence that this was a huge factor. 
 
For instance in the only people prosecuted for child rape in Rotherham, Zafran Ramzan, 21, was jailed for just nine years after being found guilty of raping a 16-year-old girl in her own home, and two counts of sexual activity with a child. The other four men were convicted of sexual activity with a child. Razwan Razaq, 30, was jailed for a total of 11 years. Umar Razaq, 24, for four and a half years. Both Adil Hussain, 20, and Mohsin Khan, 21, were sentenced to just four years in prison.

However matters are different in the main community. For instance, Neil Masterson, an apparently Catholic man (as he describes himself on his Facebook page), attacked the MP George Galloway, whose religious affiliations are not entirely clear. But who was brought up in a Catholic area of Dundee (which is known as 'Tipperary'), and is from an Irish background, which suggests that he was at least nominally of that faith. NB: Mr Galloway has denied that he ever converted to Islam (despite other claims that he did so... this tactic of neither denying or confirming if he is Muslim seems calculated to have some impact, but I couldn't speculate on whom).    

Political or Religious Differences?
Political or Religious Differences?

The assault left Mr Galloway with a possible broken jaw, and broken ribs and bruises to his head .... and perhaps unsurprisingly this didn't garner much sympathy in the press, but was apparently because Mr Masterson disliked Mr Galloway's anti-Israeli stance, and his opinions on the holocaust ... referring to Galloway as "a Hitler." However what made me pause, and showed how twisted our justice system is, was that the 'common assault charge' was also accompanied by one of 'religiously aggravated assault'.

So a white male assaults another white male, and both are possibly of the same religious background, and with no reports stating that the attacker made any reference to Galloway's religion, the attacker is  charged with 'religiously aggravated assault'.

So in summary. Organised racially and religiously targeted child rape gangs do not warrant any 'religiously or racially aggravated' charges, while an assault between an aggressor and victim from the same race and religious background, and apparently prompted by differences of political opinions attracts a 'religiously aggravated assault' charge??  

This reminds me of when Sacha Baron Cohen put a woolly hat on and called himself Ali G, and middle-class white males treated him as being 'black', despite the fact that he was not blacked up in anyway .... here Galloway talks up Islam without ever saying that he is a Muslim, and somehow the CPS decide that an attack on him by another man, who is not a Muslim, and who makes no reference to Galloway's religion, is somehow a religiously aggravated assault.

If ever there was a sign of how Political Correctness actually blinds its adherents, this must be it .... so by CPS logic, if Galloway had been attacked by a Muslim, I assume that this would not have been a religiously aggravated assault, even though Galloway may not be a Muslim.

Like I said ... the worlds turned upside down ....

Correction 09/11/14:

Mr Masterson is now being described as 'Jewish' in the press:

A Jewish man who is a full-time carer for a middle aged woman denied repeatedly punching George Galloway in the face because he "was an enemy to Judaism."

Neil Masterson who was "employed at manager level at the BBC between 2004 and 2007" is alleged to have shouted about the holocaust. Mr Galloway was interviewed by police under caution in August after he said Bradford had been "declared an Israel-free zone."

Masterson told the police: "I didn't want him to think I'm scared, Galloway is Anti-semitic and I am Jewish."



This confusion as to his faith and motives is still being displayed (he apparently converted to Judaism ~ an event which isn't always recognised in some instances), which may reflect the state of mind of Mr Masterson. Strangely, now that he is in fact described as being of another faith (Mr Galloway may be coy about his religious affiliations, but we can be sure that he is not 'Jewish'), the charges of  religiously aggravated assault against him was dropped .... WTF?

So apparently, when it was being reported that Mr Masterson was Catholic, he faced charges of  religiously aggravated assault against another man of the same faith, but when Jewish, he doesn't face that charge ... which entirely supports the thesis of the post that this is all PC driven. Minority v Different Minority = No Race Crime. Non Minority v Anyone = Race Crime

Oh and by the way, Masterson has now pleaded guilty to causing the Respect MP actual bodily harm .... which also backs my theory that 'Converts are the most dangerous of people' 

1 comment:

  1. Once you enter the world of PC madness you never can get your head straight again

    ReplyDelete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.