Friday, 27 May 2016

Scotland Brewing Up Trouble (For The Future)

Apparently the Scots are increasingly a nation of home drinkers ..... this is because shop sales of alcohol in 2015 were 20% higher in Scotland, than they were in England and Wales, with each adult consuming the equivalent of 477 pints of beer per annum.

Scotland and alcohol in 2015 (according to NHS Scotland):
  • 74% sold through off-sales
  • 52p Average price per unit. A price that has not changed for two years.
  • 20% more sales than England and Wales
  • 477 equivalent number of pints drunk per adult
The Buckfast Breakfasts ..... A Myth or Legend?
Buckfast Breakfasts ..... A Myth or Legend?

So of course the all powerful nanny SNP led government in Scotland, has said that this supports the case for minimum pricing. A position that is at odds with a recent ruling by the European Court of Justice, which made it clear that minimum pricing is a significant barrier to trade in breach of EU law. Although this is just guidance, and the matter has been referred back to the Scottish courts for a final decision on its legality .... this guidance usually acts like an instruction to domestic courts.

However I believe that this increase in home drinking is actually a slow social by-product of the ban of smoking in public houses (pubs), which has driven many men to drink at home. I suspect that if researched, there would also be an increase of women drinking (who formerly hadn't drunk, but who now drink with their partners at home), and also in domestic violence. I obviously can't prove that bet, but it just seems to me to be to be another of those unintended consequences, when politicians meddle in matters that are none of their concern.

Further more, if I am right, then the same trends and effects may well start to appear in a few years time in Wales and England. Of course I could be just talking B*llocks ..... But as I am off to the pub now, it doesn't really matter to me if I am.

3 comments:

  1. Personally I would make supermarket beer 20% more expensive than pub beer. For spirits probably 30% more. This would boost pubs and depress home alcohol .... both socially good things.

    I don't understand the point you make about cinema attendance rising in a post about drinking?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You suspect the depreciation of pub attendance to be linked to the smoking ban and yet cinema attendance continues to rise despite of it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Actually I don't make the same link. Drinking and smoking (both drug taking and potentially addictive), were inextricably linked for many (including me when I still smoked), and that link has proved hard for many to break, so they drink more at home.

    Smoking was banned in cinemas around a decade earlier and in any event, cinema going was not an addictive, or a nightly event (as pub going was for many). The clean air and block buster movies have caused cinema attendances to stabilise and rise a bit.

    The same cant be said of pubs ... but then its a different scenario.

    ReplyDelete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.