Friday, 11 November 2016

What's Good For The Goose

Apparently only one in twenty five magistrates in England and Wales is aged under forty years ... and (a presumably shocking), eighty nine per cent are white. These shocking statistics were reported by a committee of MP's on the Commons Justice Committee, who claimed that action was needed to recruit younger and more diverse JP's.

Commons Justice Committee ......

The membership of this committee was:

  • Robert Neill (Chair) Conservative (White male).
  • Richard Arkless Scottish National Party (White male).
  • Alex Chalk Conservative (White male).
  • Alberto Costa Conservative (White male).
  • Philip Davies Conservative (White male).
  • Kate Green Labour (White female).
  • Mr David Hanson Labour (White male).
  • John Howell Conservative (White male).
  • Victoria Prentis Conservative (White female).
  • Marie Rimmer Labour (White female).
  • Keith Vaz Labour (Asian male - resigned).

So ninety per cent of the committee was white, ten per cent were Asian, and thirty per cent female .... oh, and all were in their forties or well above that.

MP's general have around currently 191 female MPs, out of a total 650 members of parliament, and ethnic minorities are currently around 6% of the Members of both Houses. Which compares with 13% of UK population. I believe the current figures for MP's only, are 41 ethnic minority MPs out of a total 650 members of parliament which is less than ten per cent.

Hypocrisy is a nasty thing in any profession, but in MP's, its a rank smell that we all get a whiff of far too often.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.