Friday, 16 November 2018

Dick v Dyke

Now don't get me wrong ... if you really think that despite biology to the otherwise, you really are a girl, then perhaps you are in some metaphysical sense.

Sexual Predator ... Danger To Women and Children
Sexual Predator ... Danger To Women and Children

However, until those little biological bits are removed (and even then in some cases) .... I am not sure that its safe to treat you as a woman, just you know, to be on the safe side.

I say all this because the prison service, listening to all the shrieks from the LGBT brigade, decided to house a biological man, who despite not having had any treatment but who had informed them that he identified as a woman, in a female prison. Several sexual assaults later, they were forced to rehouse him in a male prison.

Karen White (born Stephen Terence Wood), a 52 year old man was original sent to HMP New Hall women's prison in Wakefield, West Yorkshire, on remand last September after being arrested on suspicion of repeatedly stabbing a neighbour. He had identified as female when arrested and had begun 'gender realignment', by wearing a wig, make-up and false breasts ... however crucially, he had no actions to stop his normal male attractions. While there, he sexually assaulted two women. “The complainant, while waiting, felt something hard press against the small of her back. She turned around to see the defendant stood there. She could see the defendant’s penis erect and sticking out of the top of her pants, covered by her tights.” Subsequent police investigations uncovered at least two rapes committed before his imprisonment.

He was described as being a danger to women and children (while on remand White freely admitted to probation officers he was sexually interested in children and could abuse a child and “think nothing of it”), and was jailed for what laughingly is described as 'life' (actually just nine and a half years behind bars, before he, or probably she by then, can be considered for parole), after he admitted sexually assaulting two female inmates, and previously raping two other women, and one offence of wounding. He has previous convictions for gross indecency involving children (with two boys aged nine and 12), indecent exposure, indecent assault, dishonesty and violence.

The Prison services excuse was that “While we work to manage all prisoners, including those who are transgender, sensitively and in line with the law, we are clear that the safety of all prisoners must be our absolute priority.” ..... obviously not!

No doubt law suits from the victims of the assaults will cost us a large amount of money, and no lessons will have been learnt. This wasn't the first of these types of incident, although normally its lesbian girls who dress as boys, and fool straight girls into sexual acts.

All Four Facing Jail Sentences
All Four Facing Jail Sentences

The nonsense that PC can engender, was further illustrated by the behaviour of three 'transgender' males / females who after a minor disagreement chose to beat the living crap out of a man who upset them. Michael O'Docherty (aka 'Tamzin Lush'), 'Tylah-Jo' Bryan, and 'Amarnih' Lewis-Daniel, who were all born male, and Hannah Bryan (sister I presume of 'Tylah-Jo'), were all out on a drinking binge when they ended up in London's Leicester Square Underground station.

There they had a 'minor provocation' from an unnamed man, and all four launched into a full blooded assault on him. He was hospitalised, and they were arrested. They pleaded guilty (after film of the assault became available), to violent disorder, and the magistrate considered the offence so serious that it was passed up to Blackfriars crown court for sentencing. This means that they all face possible prison later this year.

The Attack Was Filmed
The Attack

The three, who were described as transgendered, but could be still biologically male and act accordingly .... however, it behoves men who claim to be female, to act like ladies, not thugs. All of which reminded me of a story from a few years ago.

The police were left hunting for three suspects, after a woman was punched and kicked during a battle between radical leftist feminists, and some transgender activists. They had met for 'gender recognition talks' in London's Hyde Park to see if a modus of accommodation and cooperation could be reached. However, perhaps not unsurprisingly the talks soon broke down, and a 60 year old feminist was knocked to the ground and suffered bruising, after one of the transgender suspects tried to grab her camera as she filmed the meeting. The police were hunting one 'male', and two 'others' (current stage of transformation to women not known) .... of course in reality, they have nothing in common at all, but can't admit it. So no love lost between the new sisters then?

For women's pressure groups to include them as 'sisters' would mean the radical feminist pressure groups would be seen as really just LGBT cover groups, instead of acting for 'women' generally ..... this is a conundrum that the left wing women have not found a way out of. For instance would they really accept a transgendered woman as a 'spokesperson' for women's issues such as pay or promotions etc? I doubt it.      

So yet another illustration that indicates what a busted flush political correctness always has been .....       

4 comments:

  1. Not really sure where Western society is heading these days. But we seem veey keen to get wherever that is.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I cant argue with that summary. Thanks for the comment.

      Delete
  2. "Dick v Dyke", just got it, doh!

    ReplyDelete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.