Friday, 3 May 2019

Five Fingered Widows

There are cons ....

AM Site - Not What It Seemed.

and then there are cons.

The web site was for men and women to meet and have discrete sex with each other ... actually it was very pointedly aimed at those who wanted to cheat on their partners with the people who they hooked up with .... or maybe not. For instance UK males who joined were charged £179 for an affair membership, in which they were given contact details, via its own email accounts.

However when its membership was hacked, it was found that the site had just 12,000 women registered and active, while 36 million men were members. The site, which had claimed 5.5 million women were members, had been valued at $650million.

But most surprising about this story, is the fact that the site still operates, despite all the revelations, and its google blurb was still claiming that '45 Million Members Cant Be Wrong'  when I wrote this post (long after the story became public).... or is that just 'Over 35 Million Members'..... however ...

Copy Change

.... I checked just before I posted, and the site is still there, but the text copy no longer makes membership number claims, and features pictures of women who it says (if you look carefully) are *Not actual members' ..... All proving that while sex sells, the promise of sex sells just as well.

Or to misquote P.T. Barnum “Nobody ever lost a dollar by underestimating the gullibility of the public.” 

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.