Friday 9 August 2019

Lonely Voice

Algerian Islamic scholar Saïd Djabelkhir recently got into trouble with fundamentalists within the Islamic community ..
 
Saïd Djabelkhir ... Brave man.

.... when he suggested via his Circle of Lights for Free Thought organisation, that it was unhealthy for both Islam and state to be intertwined.

He bravely denounced the regressive nature of today’s Islamic scholars, particularly in regards to the interpretation of religious texts, in which they fail to 'reflect today’s needs of societies'. He singled out Saudi Arabia in particular for its role in the spread of religious radicalism, noting that the Saudis since 1979 to date, have spent more than $64 billion to propagate Islamic fundamentalism. This figure can give you an idea of the extent of the damage done to societies.

He warned that if the Muslims do not do it, then the other nations will one day force them to do it in spite of themselves. "The world is changing, and if we do not change with it, it will force us to change or worse: eliminate us."

Of course the response was pretty predictable .... numerous death threats. A hate campaign was then initiated and TV programmes vilified him in Algeria and elsewhere. Of course social media was prominent in this campaign, and a Facebook page went as far as to publish a call to murder him. With the administrator of the page providing the scholars address in the municipality of Blida, inviting people to attack him, saying: "We must deal with it today, not tomorrow."

Despite the threats, Saïd Djabelkhir did not retract his argument, and has since called for more reason in dealing with religious matters. Fat chance .... but good luck.

No comments:

Post a Comment

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.