Thursday, 12 February 2009

UK Dhimmitude Takes Another Step To Reality

This week saw a series of small steps on the UK's road to Dhimmitude with the very concept of Free Speech attacked by a Home Secretary, who is often so far up minority backsides that you can only see Left or Right painted on her shoes soles.

The Dhimmi .... An Inevitable Outcome?
The Dhimmi .... An Inevitable Outcome?

She has banned, and then deported a Dutch MP ... his crime? making a film that associates the Quran with terrorism.
 
Hardly a new association to make, seeing as every Islamic terrorist from Osama Bin Laden to the London Bombers, claim the exact same thing. So in the brave new PC Britain of New Labour its OK for a terrorist to shout "Allah Akbar" as they attack someone, but not for a film of that to be presented?

One action is meant to inspire other Muslims to attack us, while the other might incite Muslims to attack us? Oh and the only complainant? Lord Ahmed, a Muslim Labour Peer. Democracy has really taken strange turns under this Politically Correct, but strangely coy on some matters, Home Secretary. But as these comments show, we are not all asleep.

Dhimmitude - Learn Your Place In The New World Order ...
Learn Your Place In The New World Order ...

All this in a week in which Julia Robinson, a primary school head teacher, was forced out (either sacked or resigned), following a failed attempt to get the minority of Muslim children in her school to attend one interfaith assembly, in which according to the 1944 Education Act, most acts of worship have to be "wholly or mainly of a broadly Christian character", though others can reflect pupils' family backgrounds.

And in another story, a foster parent was sacked, after a sixteen year old Muslim girl in her care chose, without her knowledge to convert to Christianity. The carer, who has 10 years’ experience and has looked after more than 80 children, said she was ‘devastated’ by the decision. How I detest this collapse of our values to accommodate socially backward groups who chose to come here but detest Western values.

3 comments:

  1. Lord Ahmed has gone in to have an interesting career which includes various accusations of misconduct .... these include:

    1. He was sentenced to 12 weeks in prison Mr Justice Wilkie, which meant he would serve six weeks in jail, and he was disqualified from driving for 12 months after fatally hitting a pedestrian. He was freed just 16 days into his sentence after his charge was reduced on appeal.

    2. He later blamed a Jewish conspiracy for his driving conviction ... adding various views alleging Jewish influence on the courts. On 13 May 2013 he resigned from the Labour Party before an expulsion decision but remained in the Lords.

    3. He was recorded stating that "Even if I have to beg I am willing to raise and offer £10 million so that George W Bush and Tony Blair can be brought to the International Court of Justice on war crimes charges."

    4. In February 2019, Ahmed was accused of using his position in the House of Lords to have sex with vulnerable women. The House of Lords Commissioner for Standards, Lucy Scott-Moncrieff, found Tahira Zaman's accusations credible and substantial, but no further action was taken against Lord Ahmed, as his actions did not relate to his parliamentary duties ... He didn't resign in disgrace.

    5. On 1 March 2019, Ahmed was charged with two offences of attempted rape, and one offence of indecent assault taking place between 1971 and 1974. The alleged victims are a boy and a girl both under the age of 13. He was released on bail, and the trial has been deferred from 2019 until 2020. Two of his brothers are also charged with indecent assaults against boys.

    He remains a member of the House of Lords .... I can't say anything more in these PC times.

    But its hard to imagine many others from a different background keeping a title for this litany of events, and it appears that like his erstwhile Labour colleague Keith Vaz, his sense of honour and decency doesn't include automatically resigning, no matter what the charges.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Lord Ahmed has been convicted of rape and sexual assault committed in the 1970's. He finally resigned from the House of Lords in November 2020, before he could be expelled/stripped of his title. His older brothers Mohammed Farouq, 71, and Mohammed Tariq, 65, managed to convince the courts that they were unfit to stand trial, despite facing charges of indecent assault against the same boy abused by Lord Ahmed. However despite not facing a criminal trial, the jurors concluded that they did commit the alleged acts after hearing evidence in the case.

      This paedophile has managed to influence policies in the UK to favour Muslim sensibilities over those of European culture. Are we going to review all those earler interferences he made? Are the Labour party going to apologise for promoting him to the lords despite the fact that his behaviours should have set off alarm bells well before he was elevated to the lords?

      As has been said by you on a number of posts - we reap what we sow.

      The BBC story here

      Delete
    2. Thanks for the post(s) on this story. Saved me some work updating those posts! Actually this story was pretty well buried under regional news by the BBC which is strange considering that his numerous claims of racism /anti-Islam /Islamophobia etc always were main news for the BBC in the past.

      Delete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.