Why do Jihadists think that shouting the term
"Allahu Akbar" ("Allah is greatest" in Arabic), just before you murder someone, is a good advert for the self-styled
'religion of peace'?
 |
| A Believer In Peaceful Religion .... |
Because of course there is little peace in Islam
(which is also the term used for 'submission') these days, if there ever was .... so only the most blinkered optimist has ever interpreted it as
peaceful. Except possibly in the context of
'as peaceful as a morgue'.
The latest Jihadist terror attack in Liege, Belgium, involved Benjamin Herman, a petty criminal Islamic convert of Belgian descent, who stabbed two police women to death, grabbed their guns, then shot a passenger in a nearby car, took another woman hostage, and was killed in a gun fight with the police. He had murdered an ex-prisoner from his former prison the night before.
 |
| Tense Moments When He Took A Hostage ..... |
And Allah's latest butcher's bill? Three innocent dead, another person dead in a private dispute, two more innocent injured, and one of Allah's warriors heading to paradise. Where in their creed does it say that murdering three people, or
injuring people is the short cut to paradise? If it does, what does it
say about the religion?
 |
| Continents Battle Zone ... |
Until we can stop this religion from propagating its hateful nature across societies that are too paralysed by political correctness to tackle it, we will continue to see murder and mayhem break out randomly on our streets, and
'Allahu Akbar', the battle cry of backwardness, will become the soundtrack to the century.
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.
Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.
Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.
Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.
Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.