Friday, 28 October 2022

In Days Of Yore

 When in days of old, when knights were bold .....

Small War Horses And Long Legs
Small War Horses And Long Legs


..... most of them were probably well muscled, short arses.
 
Now I'm sure there are probably scientific studies, and also archaeological research that show that quite a few of the elites (with their access to higher protein diets than the peasantry), were around the 6 foot mark. However if they were six footers, then they would likely have been dragging their feet on the ground when they got on their horses.
 
Knight On Big War Horse Is Wrong
Knights Of Old - Now

It appears that all those Hollywood images of knights of your as strapping lads,  on large war horses (well apart from Alan Ladd, who was famously very small), were wishful thinking.  The reason I can say this is because a recent study of the bones of early to late medieval horses (AD 300 to 1650), found that most of these mighty steeds were below 14.2 hands in height. 

This is as opposed to the horses used in modern day historical film dramas which average 17 to 18 hands. Now when you consider that a 'hand' in horse measurements is four inches and measured from the ground to the top of the shoulders, this is quite a difference. In fact most knights horses would be classed as ponies in modern classifications. While the horses used as mounts in films are almost the height of Shire horses. 
 
Alan Ladd And His War Pony
Alan Ladd And His War Pony

 
The 171 skeletons examined showed that back then, horses even the size of modern racehorses or showjumpers were very rare (virtually none) ..... and this included medieval royal stables. So oddly, Alan Ladd will be smirking, because he would have been perfect for the war ponies that they were really riding.

2 comments:

  1. So those tapestry images at the top of the story, where the riders legs nearly hit the floor, are not false perspective and heights, but actually are true representations of horse riders at the time. Its funny that we didn't realise for all these centuries that they weren't crap artists, but actually showing what they saw correctly.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yore right of course. Everyone assumed that the tapestry makers were just bad at relatives heights or were emphasising how big the knights were. Now we know that they were riding horses no bigger than modern ponies. Thanks for the comment Peter.

      Delete

All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.

Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.

Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.

Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.

Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.