Things We Didn't Need Manufactured

Criminals show little compunction in using weapons to hurt, threaten, or injure the rest of us ..... knives of course are very easy to get hold of, guns less so, but still comparatively easy to obtain. I myself was offered a gun in a pub for £250.00 in the early 1990's, so I know it wouldn't have been hard to get one if wanted.

But even so, miss-using a genuine tool as a weapon is far better and easier for a criminal, as it offers the possible defence of a genuine usage as an excuse if stopped with it. The sort of thing I am talking about is the Nail Gun, which fortunately for all of us, needs to be attached to a mains power unit to generate the air compression required to shoot the nails. Unfortunately, even as I write this, I suggest that some idiot will be trying to find away to remove the need for a mains power supply, and once they crack this, nutcases will be able to 'tool up' and use them as portable weapons.

In the meantime, the other most dangerous 'weapons' available to criminals, outside of the gun or the knife, are the Taser or a high voltage electric 'stun gun', both of  which are both illegal in the UK, but not necesarily in Europe. The high voltage electric 'stun guns' for example are freely available in 'novelty' shops in Italy, and Bulgaria (I saw them in both countries last year), as well as other Eastern European countries for about €40 - €50, and which I should imagine would be comparatively easy to return to the UK with, hidden in holiday luggage .... certainly if you were driving back on the ferry, in any event they are available on the Internet as well ...


Pocket 'Stun' gun of the type on sale on the
Internet and some European Countries. 

 

In the US of course, these are likely to be freely available in many states, and illegally in the rest, but neither are really killing machines ...... so when you read that some manufacturer has built and manufactured a 'Super Taser', which is designed according to the makers, to "incapacitate larger animals more effectively and safer than current animal control tools", you have to wonder if there is any accountabilty in the world anymore. The $2,000 (£1,250) Wildlife Taser has a range of up to 35ft (10m) and can fire three shots without reloading, all of  which can penetrate a large animals hide.

Taser Gun

 

Now correct me if I am wrong, but if a normal Taser shot (or electric stun gun) can incapacitate normal people (with a maximum of two shots sufficient for even the most violent drugged up nutter), then one that can knock a grizzly bear over, would most likely carry a higher risk of killing a human?

I accept that the odd Forest Ranger (such as Ranger Smith), may have had the odd need to knock over a Bear or a Moose in some extreme situation ..... but surely it has never been such a need, that it could justify mass production of this 'control tool'? After selling them to all the "wildlife managers, field biologists and zoo caretakers" in North America, who else will they be sold to in order to justify the cost of manufacture of this potentially lethal weapon?

It's not a cheap item, but no doubt cheaper Chinese copies will soon flood the market, and therefore I strongly suspect that its just a matter of time before they are just another part of the criminals arsenal against the rest of us ....... a fatality must happen sooner or later.  

Sometimes the free market produces items that we were better off without, because they can be very easily misused ...this in my opinion is one of them.

The Faces of Modern Britain Part ll

Three boys, I hesitate to call these animals young men, Rogel McMorris, Jason Brew and Hector Muaimba were convicted of rape and given sentences of nine years and six years for a vicious gang rape of a girl with a mental age of eight, culminating in throwing acid over the victim.

A judge decided that despite the horror of the attack, these soft sentences were sufficient to send out a message to teen gang animals. Disability charities however disagreed and said that the sentences were unduly lenient and sent out the "wrong message". The girls views are not known as she is still in a coma after the attack.

The Crown Prosecution Service is appealing the sentences but no one really expects more than a year or so to be added to the sentences in case the scum get a case under the ever reliable Human Rights Act, that did nothing for the victim, but which will protect these scumbags from unduly 'harsh' sentences.

When "Animal Rights" subvert "Human Rights"

Once again an "Animal Rights" type organisation has been found guilty of criminal and terrorist like behaviour ............ they are cowards and scum, who hide behind balaclava's, telephones, and the dead of night, to terrorise people who are not supporters of their extreme views.

How else can you reasonably describe groups who send used female sanitary towels, or used condoms, razor blades, and syringe needles (claimed to be from people who are infected with AIDS), to people and businesses in the post? And what do the used condoms tell you about the type of excitement these 'thrill seekers' get from threatening people?

This blog has pointed out before, that these people are criminals and nothing less, but are all too easily allowed to campaign with supposedly 'legal and law abiding' groups such as the Greens.

There are no excuses in a democracy for attacking people who don't subscribe to your views, but listening to the spokeswoman for Stop Huntingdon Animal Cruelty (SHAC), aka the Animal Liberation Front (According to the police "SHAC and the ALF are one and the same thing, there is no club, no rules of membership." ), on Radio Four, was like listening to a Nazi Lawyer at Nuremberg.

Debbie Vincent, who according to this web site, has a criminal conviction of her own for her behaviours in support of SHAC, (and had been sentenced to a 120-hour community punishment order), squirmed and prevaricated, and could not bring herself to condemn the activities of these scum, whilst just about saying something like 'It's not us, but I can understand why people might take these actions".

I hope they get very, very, long sentences, but expect that our justice system will let them out far too soon. They are profiled here in the crime pages, not as martyrs, not political, just the crime pages, which is where they deserve to be, because thats all they are.

Here are the latest faces of animal lunacy..... of people who have been convicted of blackmail, paedophile smears, criminal damage, bomb hoaxes, and the reason why they hurt their fellow human beings? ............ A rats rights.

Clockwise from left:

Gregg Avery (main pic), Nathasha Avery, Heather Nicholson,

Gerrah Selby, Dan Amos, Gavin Medd-Hall, Daniel Wadham