There's been a war of words between 'Saint Bob' Geldof and the BBC over the story that alleges that far from 'feeding the world', at least some of the monies raised by the Band Aid campaign were spent on Guns and Bullets to feed the wars that were a constant factor in Ethiopia at the time.
As a cynic, I am hardly surprised by the allegations as there have been similar stories about western charities monies being syphoned off through fraud or misappropriation in Africa before, so why wouldn't Eritrean warlords have been able to fool a bunch of musical 'Luvvies'?
The story has hung about for a few days, so it may have some legs as the BBC are showing no signs of retracting in the face of the Geldoff tirade. A few years ago, they would have collapsed under his frown, but his star has waned and the BBC obviously feel more able to stand their ground inspite of the challenge to its truthfulness.
Translate
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Followers
Most Visited Posts In Last 30 Days
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(177)
-
▼
March
(14)
- Tensions In The Middle East
- Slow Reforms In Yemen And Elsewhere
- Labours "Nice'n'Sleazy does it" government
- Gaddafi's Foreign Adventures
- Konspiracy Korner
- The Truth Is Plain For All To See
- The Right To Protest Peacefully
- Turkey And That Pesky 'Genocide' Question.
- A Personal Buddha
- Feed The Birds? Not In Dumfries Matey!
- Band Aid or Gun Trade?
- UK Welfare Benefits For The World
- When Will We Learn?
- Gilligans Islamic Island
-
▼
March
(14)
Its a Pucking World
Dreamberry Wine Cover
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.
Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.
Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.
Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.
Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.