When the Labour Party encouraged mass Muslim immigration in to the UK in the 1970's and again in the 1990's, it was based on the same sort of strategic plan that had said that Scottish Devolution would mean that everyone north of Hadrian's Wall would continue to vote vote for the Labour Party (forever) as they had done for the last 50 yrs.
Of course, as we have recently seen, this strategic plan was fatally flawed by the hubris of the strategists i.e. The mistaken belief that everyone north of watford (and especially in Scotland), was actually an active or lapsed natural Labour Party voter. This in fact was completely wrong .... the moment the Scots got a whiff of real power they started voting for the SNP in their droves, and now the Labour Party is a poor second place party in that country, and probably will only ever get some power there by forming a coalition with the Liberals.
Now they are also discovering that the Islamic vote, far from being eternally grateful for being allowed into a socialist paradise (with its 'happy' marriages, wimmins rites, and general atheistic whiff), are actually likely to start voting for 'Sharia parties' as soon as their mass of numbers allow them to win, whatever the non Muslims want to do ..... in the meantime, they seem to have found a halfway house by massing behind the 'Respect Party' with its eternal candidate George Galloway. This is basically a one man show, (Galloway co-founded the Respect Party on an the anti-war platform .... using the issue of the war in Iraq to mobilise its vote), with an agenda that's a mix of extremely pro-Islam, anti Israeli and left wing social policies.
Now in the 'safe' Bradford West parliamentary seat, the Respect party candidate (guess who?), has beaten Labour, winning the by-election by 10,100 votes..... the Labour Party candidate Imran Hussein was a distant second in what Galloway called the 'Bradford Spring'. "They have to stop supporting illegal, bloody, costly foreign wars because one of the reasons why they were so decisively defeated this evening is that the public don't believe that they have atoned for their role in the invasion and occupation of other people's countries and the drowning of those countries in blood" .... meaning Iraq and Afghanistan (not non Muslim Serbia or Sierre Leone) ....
So what did the Labour Party strategists blame this terrible defeat on? A flawed immigration policy perhaps? Or maybe an acceptance that this is what will eventually happen in all Muslim immigrant areas? .... No, Labour MP Toby Perkins told the press, "I think frankly there wasn't a lot the other parties could do about it. [Voters had] seen him on Big Brother. They wanted him on their streets and now they've got it" ....
So not only a denial of the reality of the Britain they have created, but a slap in the face for those very shallow ex labour voters, who actually would apparently rather vote for an 'ex Big Brother contestant', than the Labour Parties policies ..... Oh, and here's a thought, as predicted here before, Ed Milliband the Labour leader is Jewish, the majority of the ex labour voting population in Bradford West are Muslim ..... the Respect Party specifically targeted the Asian wards .... any connection?
Of course, as we have recently seen, this strategic plan was fatally flawed by the hubris of the strategists i.e. The mistaken belief that everyone north of watford (and especially in Scotland), was actually an active or lapsed natural Labour Party voter. This in fact was completely wrong .... the moment the Scots got a whiff of real power they started voting for the SNP in their droves, and now the Labour Party is a poor second place party in that country, and probably will only ever get some power there by forming a coalition with the Liberals.
Now they are also discovering that the Islamic vote, far from being eternally grateful for being allowed into a socialist paradise (with its 'happy' marriages, wimmins rites, and general atheistic whiff), are actually likely to start voting for 'Sharia parties' as soon as their mass of numbers allow them to win, whatever the non Muslims want to do ..... in the meantime, they seem to have found a halfway house by massing behind the 'Respect Party' with its eternal candidate George Galloway. This is basically a one man show, (Galloway co-founded the Respect Party on an the anti-war platform .... using the issue of the war in Iraq to mobilise its vote), with an agenda that's a mix of extremely pro-Islam, anti Israeli and left wing social policies.
 |
| Respect George Galloway ...... |
Now in the 'safe' Bradford West parliamentary seat, the Respect party candidate (guess who?), has beaten Labour, winning the by-election by 10,100 votes..... the Labour Party candidate Imran Hussein was a distant second in what Galloway called the 'Bradford Spring'. "They have to stop supporting illegal, bloody, costly foreign wars because one of the reasons why they were so decisively defeated this evening is that the public don't believe that they have atoned for their role in the invasion and occupation of other people's countries and the drowning of those countries in blood" .... meaning Iraq and Afghanistan (not non Muslim Serbia or Sierre Leone) ....
So what did the Labour Party strategists blame this terrible defeat on? A flawed immigration policy perhaps? Or maybe an acceptance that this is what will eventually happen in all Muslim immigrant areas? .... No, Labour MP Toby Perkins told the press, "I think frankly there wasn't a lot the other parties could do about it. [Voters had] seen him on Big Brother. They wanted him on their streets and now they've got it" ....
So not only a denial of the reality of the Britain they have created, but a slap in the face for those very shallow ex labour voters, who actually would apparently rather vote for an 'ex Big Brother contestant', than the Labour Parties policies ..... Oh, and here's a thought, as predicted here before, Ed Milliband the Labour leader is Jewish, the majority of the ex labour voting population in Bradford West are Muslim ..... the Respect Party specifically targeted the Asian wards .... any connection?
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.
Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.
Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.
Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.
Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.