As IS meets its final dissolution of territory (it may well have lost its last land area by the time this is posted), we face the inevitable question of what is going to happen to the 'foreign' fighters and supporters who flooded out of Europe and elsewhere, to join IS in Syria and Iraq.
They and their families, all think that they should be allowed to just come back here, and get housed and with welfare benefits etc, as though they have done nothing wrong.
Many of the rest of us very strongly disagree.
They are, at the end of the day 'traitors' .... they supported a regime that had an implacable hatred of us as non-Muslims, and practised terrible crimes in the areas it came to control. Had it prevailed i.e. had Russian, US and European forces not finally intervened (as usual the Arabs/Muslims sat on their arses doing nothing except stoke the conflict up), then they would have created one of the most barbaric states in world history, as well as igniting fighting across the region and then the globe.
In some cases, where the men or women went to become IS fighters, many European governments have, like the British government, removed their citizenship's, and they are effectively stateless. But in our usual manner, we have somehow determined the mere 'supporters' of IS, those who took no physical part in the actual killings, tortures, rapes and murders, but merely 'supported' the killings, tortures, rapes and murders, can be let back here.
For instance, one of three schoolgirls who left east London in 2015 to join the Islamic State group, Shamima Begum, wants to return to the UK now that the last stronghold has fallen. Noticeably, she hung out until the very last moments of the groups grip on Baghuz - the group's last territory in eastern Syria, and has stated that she has 'no regrets', (other then presumably losing). She and her husband only left Baghuz because she "was weak," and "could not endure the suffering and hardship that staying on the battlefield involved. But I was also frightened that the child I am about to give birth to, would die like my other children if I stayed on."
Apparently the driving force of her desire to 'come home to Britain', is this fact that she is or was, nine months pregnant and wanted to come home for her baby (she had lost two already while in the care of IS's Caliphate). This after her 'husband' surrendered to a group of Syrian fighters as they left Baghuz, and she was forced to go to a refugee camp in northern Syria, which houses 39,000 people, some of whom may actually have been victims of IS barbarism by her husband.
Chillingly, when asked by a British journalist for The Times newspaper about her experiences of living in the one-time IS stronghold of Raqqa, and whether it had lived up to her ideas, she said: "Yes, it did. It was like a normal life. The life that they show on the propaganda videos - it's a normal life. Every now and then there are bombs and stuff. But other than that..." She added that seeing her first "severed head" in a bin "didn't faze me at all. It was from a captured fighter seized on the battlefield, an enemy of Islam. I thought only of what he would have done to a Muslim woman if he had the chance." .... the 'enemy of Islam' she is referring to would also have been a Muslim, but that doesn't enter her world view. The 'normal life', she lived was in housing stolen from people IS murdered, or had driven off,
"I'm not the same silly little 15-year-old schoolgirl who ran away from Bethnal Green four years ago," she told the journalist. "I don't regret coming here."
In fact her only regret is that the suppression of IS had come as a "shock" and that the IS "Caliphate" was now at an end. "I don't have high hopes. They are just getting smaller and smaller," she said. "And there is so much oppression and corruption going on [in the group] that I don't really think they deserve victory."
Not that she really likes the idea of coming the Britain, but she has the baby to consider "That's why I really want to get back to Britain because I know it will be taken care of - health-wise, at least," she said. "I'll do anything required just to be able to come home and live quietly with my child."
What a gain for Britain it will be to have this woman bringing up her baby here ..... not a possible problem in sight! We reap what we sow. Our weakness in tolerating these people will destroy our culture for good.
So whether its bringing up baby, or Je Suis Non Regret, we will probably still have to take her back sometime or other.
 |
| ISIS Caliphate Collapse ..... |
They and their families, all think that they should be allowed to just come back here, and get housed and with welfare benefits etc, as though they have done nothing wrong.
Many of the rest of us very strongly disagree.
They are, at the end of the day 'traitors' .... they supported a regime that had an implacable hatred of us as non-Muslims, and practised terrible crimes in the areas it came to control. Had it prevailed i.e. had Russian, US and European forces not finally intervened (as usual the Arabs/Muslims sat on their arses doing nothing except stoke the conflict up), then they would have created one of the most barbaric states in world history, as well as igniting fighting across the region and then the globe.
In some cases, where the men or women went to become IS fighters, many European governments have, like the British government, removed their citizenship's, and they are effectively stateless. But in our usual manner, we have somehow determined the mere 'supporters' of IS, those who took no physical part in the actual killings, tortures, rapes and murders, but merely 'supported' the killings, tortures, rapes and murders, can be let back here.
 |
| Shamima Begum - Not The Same Silly Little 15-year-old Schoolgirl Anymore. |
For instance, one of three schoolgirls who left east London in 2015 to join the Islamic State group, Shamima Begum, wants to return to the UK now that the last stronghold has fallen. Noticeably, she hung out until the very last moments of the groups grip on Baghuz - the group's last territory in eastern Syria, and has stated that she has 'no regrets', (other then presumably losing). She and her husband only left Baghuz because she "was weak," and "could not endure the suffering and hardship that staying on the battlefield involved. But I was also frightened that the child I am about to give birth to, would die like my other children if I stayed on."
Apparently the driving force of her desire to 'come home to Britain', is this fact that she is or was, nine months pregnant and wanted to come home for her baby (she had lost two already while in the care of IS's Caliphate). This after her 'husband' surrendered to a group of Syrian fighters as they left Baghuz, and she was forced to go to a refugee camp in northern Syria, which houses 39,000 people, some of whom may actually have been victims of IS barbarism by her husband.
Chillingly, when asked by a British journalist for The Times newspaper about her experiences of living in the one-time IS stronghold of Raqqa, and whether it had lived up to her ideas, she said: "Yes, it did. It was like a normal life. The life that they show on the propaganda videos - it's a normal life. Every now and then there are bombs and stuff. But other than that..." She added that seeing her first "severed head" in a bin "didn't faze me at all. It was from a captured fighter seized on the battlefield, an enemy of Islam. I thought only of what he would have done to a Muslim woman if he had the chance." .... the 'enemy of Islam' she is referring to would also have been a Muslim, but that doesn't enter her world view. The 'normal life', she lived was in housing stolen from people IS murdered, or had driven off,
"I'm not the same silly little 15-year-old schoolgirl who ran away from Bethnal Green four years ago," she told the journalist. "I don't regret coming here."
In fact her only regret is that the suppression of IS had come as a "shock" and that the IS "Caliphate" was now at an end. "I don't have high hopes. They are just getting smaller and smaller," she said. "And there is so much oppression and corruption going on [in the group] that I don't really think they deserve victory."
Not that she really likes the idea of coming the Britain, but she has the baby to consider "That's why I really want to get back to Britain because I know it will be taken care of - health-wise, at least," she said. "I'll do anything required just to be able to come home and live quietly with my child."
What a gain for Britain it will be to have this woman bringing up her baby here ..... not a possible problem in sight! We reap what we sow. Our weakness in tolerating these people will destroy our culture for good.
So whether its bringing up baby, or Je Suis Non Regret, we will probably still have to take her back sometime or other.
Of course she wants to come back to the UK and live a peaceful life with her child. The only comparison I can think of is that of Flat Earthers who have a Worldview so irrational and alien that we don't know what to do with it. They ignore all the evidence, make up their own and insult rational people because... damned if I know. Modern society can be too accommodating; yes, we quite rightly look after the weak and the disadvantaged but at the same time we allow dangerous idiots space to practice their buffoonery.
ReplyDeleteShe is not alone in her buffoonery as you put it.
DeleteWe face hundreds of these people coming back and attacking us for decades .... we are fools to allow it. Simply ban them from entry as enemies of the state, or is that too un pc/multicultural for our spineless politicians.
Her sense of entitlement knows no bounds. She reportedly believes that she deserves sympathy from us for her ordeal.
DeleteHer good for nothing Bangladeshi family are calling for us to send someone to rescue her and bring her back. The fact that she's had a little boy just spurred on their demands.
It's sickening.
It appears that as usual the bleeding hearts will win and the majorities view will be totally ignored. Thanks for the comment.
Delete