In
our increasingly strange, politically correct, woke, cancel culture, health and safety aware
society ....
..... its amazing that any of the emergency services work at all.
Take
for example the Greater Manchester Fire Service in England ... It appears that
its high command has been infected with much of the heavy handed PC concerns that the left has often inflicted
upon us ... even when some jobs are by their very nature, responding to dangerous events, or helping others in a public emergency.
So when the Islamic bomber committed his outrage at the
Manchester Arena in 2017, following a concert by American singer Ariana
Grande, its perhaps not a massive surprise to find that when the bomb
blast was reported, the Manchester fire chiefs reportedly took over two hours to release a number of trained rescue teams to the scene.
These teams were meant to be the terrorist attack specialist response teams, and equipped with stretchers and first aid units, even the delayed initial firefighter deployment, was only the standard 12 firefighters (the number deployed to a normal house fire).
This was because they were so "risk averse" (according to Matthew
Hall, who as ex-deputy commissioner of the London Fire Service, who was the
'expert' making the report), and that for a least an hour and 20 minutes
after the blast, there was no one effectively in charge of their response. This
resulted in fire fighters being held back at a fire station just 3 miles
away, because the commanders had to make a balanced decision, between
saving the lives of the public (which is in fact the reason for their existence),
and the safety "duty of care" of the firefighters.
On the other hand, the front-line police turned
up immediately, with only protecting the public as their primary consideration, however the Greater Manchester Police command neglected to officially declare it a terrorist incident to the other emergency services (But as it was on all the news channels as a suspected terrorist incident within 20 minutes, that's hardly an excuse for the other services). There was also criticism that the emergency service commanders didn't meet up at the site to co-ordinate the response.
The Ambulance service also was subject to criticism. However while only three paramedics actually went to the blast centre, medical treatment was provided nearby by other paramedics in the casualty clearance areas where the injured were being taken to, but this resulted in many casualties being carried from the scene on makeshift
stretchers. Again this was because of local health and safety polices and procedures, which prohibited paramedics working in the blast area.
I
don't know why this inappropriate response scandal has only received mainly local press coverage, and virtually no government follow up, or no calls
in parliament by MP's to scourge the safety checks culture (and people), that
apparently paralysed one emergency service in to complete inactivity, and hindered another, during a
national disaster. This public sector inflexible and bureaucratic response, has been displayed during the lifting of the Covid-19 restrictions, the civil service and public sector office workers, are refusing to go back to their offices, until duty of care, health and safety assessment reviews are carried out on every building, and probably every local office cupboard, while the private sector has largely returned to working more normally, even after conducting their own safety reviews quickly.
But think on this, if 9/11 had been in Manchester, then the Fire Service and Ambulance service responses would have responded very differently to those in New York .... what a national scandal that would have been!
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.
Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.
Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.
Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.
Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.