The PC driven BBC has reported on yet another Muslim, Pakistani paedophile rape ring operating in the UK ... however in the radio reports they don't mention the racial and religious aspects of the gang.... all the victims (one aged 12) were white, non Muslims.
All the gang were non white, Muslim men of Pakistani descent.
 |
| Child Rapists |
All the gang were non white, Muslim men of Pakistani descent.
If this was a White Christian paedophile gang, drugging and raping
Muslim Asian girls, I find it impossible to image that the nationalities
wouldn't be mentioned in every report by the BBC, and in fact be the
basis of beating us all up for being 'racists'.
As it is the eight men have had rather lenient sentences, some as low as six years, while others have eleven years minimum (with indeterminate sentences) for the rape of the twenty-seven girls who came forward to say they had been victims .... I'll repeat this Twenty-Seven girls, and not once did social services or police notice anything wrong.
As it is the eight men have had rather lenient sentences, some as low as six years, while others have eleven years minimum (with indeterminate sentences) for the rape of the twenty-seven girls who came forward to say they had been victims .... I'll repeat this Twenty-Seven girls, and not once did social services or police notice anything wrong.
Why? Because like the BBC, they refuse to acknowledge the fact that there are regular reports of gangs of Pakistani men systematically raping their way across Northern England, because it doesn't fit the PC profile they have decided we must all pander to.
There was another gang doing exactly the same thing in Manchester, sentenced in August .... only reported on the BBC UK North page, and which I posted on at the time...... maximum sentence a mere nine years, with the lowest getting just four months. And there were other reports, of similar activities .....again no association made, no warnings issued and all in the North of England ... mind you we are soft on all paedophile rapists.
Not once has anyone made the association between the religion of peace's idea that Muslim girls are owned by the males, never to have relationships outside marriage and untouchable ... nor the fact that Muslim men are told that non Muslims don't count, and anything you can take in your right hand (i.e. By force) is yours to do with as you want ..... and therein lies the mindset that seems to be in force.
Qur'an (33:50) - "O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war .... while the rest of this section allows the prophet to take have unlimited sex (I kid you not), this part is a justification for rape. We live in the 'house of war' i.e. Non Muslim lands, so any woman taken is a 'prisoner of war'. Now I know that the apologists for Islam will cite context .... the faithful take it as the literal word of god and a 'Divine' command by Allah.
Sura (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people." Sura (5:80) Sura (3:28) Sura (3:118) Sura (9:23) Sura (53:29) Sura (3:85) Sura (1:5-7)
Update: Jack Straw has raised the issue of some Pakistani men in Britain seeing white girls as "easy meat" for sexual abuse. The Blackburn MP said there was a "specific problem" in some areas where men of Pakistani heritage "target vulnerable white girls". This has forced the BBC to discuss the matter .... much to their discomfort.
There was another gang doing exactly the same thing in Manchester, sentenced in August .... only reported on the BBC UK North page, and which I posted on at the time...... maximum sentence a mere nine years, with the lowest getting just four months. And there were other reports, of similar activities .....again no association made, no warnings issued and all in the North of England ... mind you we are soft on all paedophile rapists.
Not once has anyone made the association between the religion of peace's idea that Muslim girls are owned by the males, never to have relationships outside marriage and untouchable ... nor the fact that Muslim men are told that non Muslims don't count, and anything you can take in your right hand (i.e. By force) is yours to do with as you want ..... and therein lies the mindset that seems to be in force.
Qur'an (33:50) - "O Prophet! surely We have made lawful to you your wives whom you have given their dowries, and those whom your right hand possesses out of those whom Allah has given to you as prisoners of war .... while the rest of this section allows the prophet to take have unlimited sex (I kid you not), this part is a justification for rape. We live in the 'house of war' i.e. Non Muslim lands, so any woman taken is a 'prisoner of war'. Now I know that the apologists for Islam will cite context .... the faithful take it as the literal word of god and a 'Divine' command by Allah.
Sura (5:51) - "O you who believe! do not take the Jews and the Christians for friends; they are friends of each other; and whoever amongst you takes them for a friend, then surely he is one of them; surely Allah does not guide the unjust people." Sura (5:80) Sura (3:28) Sura (3:118) Sura (9:23) Sura (53:29) Sura (3:85) Sura (1:5-7)
Update: Jack Straw has raised the issue of some Pakistani men in Britain seeing white girls as "easy meat" for sexual abuse. The Blackburn MP said there was a "specific problem" in some areas where men of Pakistani heritage "target vulnerable white girls". This has forced the BBC to discuss the matter .... much to their discomfort.
I see that the left wing keep trying to 'widen' the debate so that pakistani men are 'lost in crowd' ..... after Keith Vas, Barnado's are at it.
ReplyDelete