Rapist Paedophile Can't Be Deported From Britain

This story illustrates everything that's wrong with New Labours Britain ....... and forms the final of my 'Broken Britain' posts.

Zulfar Hussain, is a Pakistani national who lived in Blackburn, and who was jailed for just five years in 2007, for grooming, abducting (aka kidnapping), drugging, and raping two girls both aged under 16. In other words an asian paedophile, grooming girls in council care as part of a ring (he had an accomplice), with Qaiser Naveed, another Pakistani national, who was also jailed for the same offences.

Before I go further, lets examine aspects of the story so far.

The mainstream media has consistently denied the news and anecdotal stories coming out of Lancashire and Yorkshire, that Pakistani men were hanging outside schools and grooming underage (mainly white, but not exclusively so) girls. Yet this story, which appears to confirm these stories, is somehow ignored by the mainstream media, and in fact in the BBC version, the story is only considered a small 'local' news story.

The list of crimes committed by these men are

• Grooming a minor for sexual activity.
• Abduction of a child (kidnapping in the old money).
• Drugging a minor
• Rape of a minor

Yet the sentence is ......... just 5 years, with two years knocked off automatically, under the New Labour's revolving door criminal justice system. What a misnomer those words have become 'criminal justice' .... 'justice for criminals' is about right. Now I don't know what you might think about this, but at a rough estimate of five years for each offence, this set crimes should have resulted in at least 20 years in prison, not 5yrs reduced to 3yrs.

Well at least they were made to sign the sex offenders register (pathetic), and would be deported because they were foreign nationals (do you remember that promise?)

Anyway, to continue this story because it does get worse.

The Home Secretary says that both of these pigs should be 'deported' when they have served what was laughably called a sentence, but Zulfar Hussain appeals, and in topsy-turvey land, he wins, because a British judge thinks that an 'foreign, kidnapping, drug dealing, rapist's, human rights' would be breached by his being deported.

Justice minister Jack Straw merely called the move "concerning" and backed the Home Office's decision to appeal Hussain's bid to stay in the country.... well thank god for that eh? Jack Straw backs an appeal. He went on to say, that "If they had not [appealed], I would have been straight on to the Home Secretary Alan Johnson and he would have insisted on an appeal ".

"Tough on Crime, Tough on the causes of Crime" eh Jack?

Of course the real problem is that we have this Labour imposed "Human Rights Act" which has proved to be nothing more than a labour lawyers charter, used by illegal immigrants, criminals, terrorists, and of course 'human rights groups', to override any measure, that the general public would consider to be sensible, in favour of those who threaten our lives or our children's safety.

The questions that are never answered about this perverse legislation are:

• Why is the 'human rights act' administered this way in the UK when it appears not to be on the continent?
• Why do our judges and lawyers apparently make perverse judgements against public interests and in favour of criminals and the legal industry that thrives off them?
• Why can't we just scrap it, or at least ensure that it can't be used against public or national safety by wrapping it inside a supremacy of Parliament Act, that put the provisions of UK national security and public safety (including limiting its provisions in prisons or too criminals to prevent abuses such as suing their victims) above the act, and ensuring that it was interpreted as it is elsewhere in Europe, with the intention of parliament to the fore

We have an election coming up, but sadly I suspect that we have already lost any chance of removing those who have created the situation I have just described.

I for one mourn for the Britain where this sort of dangerous PC nonsense would have been laughed at ....... now its here now, and we are lost as a nation.

Dumbass Comments

What can you say when a public servant, who's primary aim should be the protection of the public from dangerous convicted criminals, makes the complaint that 'society is too "risk-averse" to allow 'life term' prisoners to be released early from jail'.

What sort of idiot, apparently believes that the public should be prepared to take risks and let so called 'lifers' i.e. murderers, serial rapists, ever dangerous paedophiles etc out on the street early?

Well the UK Parole Board chairman Sir David Latham, is named in the story as stating that the drop in the proportion of 'life-term' inmates who were freed was an "over-reaction" According to the story, over the past five years, the proportion of life sentence prisoners who have successfully applied for release has dropped from about 35% to 15%. Sir David said this was an "over-reaction" when re-offending rates had remained stable at between 1% and 2%.

He raised the prospect that his interview would be "distorted" by the press but said an open debate on the issue was needed ..... it almost beggars belief that someone in his position wants 'life-term' prisoners released faster. I would have thought that 35% was far too high, and that something between 5 -10% would be more in line with what we as a public want let out,

What's worse, is the irony that these released prisoners are described as 'life-term' inmates, when they patently are not .... its part of the great liberal con played on the rest of us, that we continue to describe fixed term sentences as 'life', when they are patently not, else I wouldn't have a story to blog on.

Justice For All?

I was much struck by one aspect of the biker murder trial, that is the sentencing ....

Bikers Challenge The Police

.... all the participants (whether the gunman or not) were given 'Life' (well what passes for a Life sentence in the UK i.e. you will be released at some time) sentences. One look at their supporters, gives you a clue that apart from a 'leather fetish', threatening behaviour is another big factor in their lives!