We have discussed in the past, the troubles of Mexico as it tries unsuccessfully to beat the drug cartels .....
 |
| Mexican Cartel Leader Arrested |
A battle that it increasingly looks like its losing.
Showing posts with label White flight. Show all posts
Showing posts with label White flight. Show all posts
Friday, 15 September 2023
Money, Drugs, Guns and Urban Decay
Friday, 29 September 2017
Its Not All Black And White
The term "White Flight" originated in the United States, starting in the 1950s and 1960s, and applied to the large-scale migration of people of various European ancestries from racially mixed urban regions to more racially homogeneous suburban or exurban regions. This is often linked to what is sometimes termed the 'Great Migrations' of the African-American populations.
Until the early 20th century, more than 90 percent of the African-American population lived in the American South, and four-fifths were living in rural agrarian areas. However by the end of the first and second waves of the great migrations, while 53 percent of the African-American population remained in the South, 40 percent lived in the North.
 |
| Black And White Ideal ... Socially United 1950's and 1960's |
Until the early 20th century, more than 90 percent of the African-American population lived in the American South, and four-fifths were living in rural agrarian areas. However by the end of the first and second waves of the great migrations, while 53 percent of the African-American population remained in the South, 40 percent lived in the North.
Friday, 19 July 2013
Detroit's Decaying Majesty
The collapse of the old cities of the Industrial revolution is apparent across the Western world (first in, first out, springs to mind), and nowhere more so than the Northern cities of the US -
..... Such as Detroit, and too a lesser extent cities like Chicago, which have both suffered from the twin blights of the collapse of traditional manufacturing, and a mass influx of overwhelmingly African-American immigration, that caused 'white flight' from the centres.
 |
| Detroit in Decline |
..... Such as Detroit, and too a lesser extent cities like Chicago, which have both suffered from the twin blights of the collapse of traditional manufacturing, and a mass influx of overwhelmingly African-American immigration, that caused 'white flight' from the centres.
Friday, 3 May 2013
London Capital Of The World - But Not Britain
As a sign of the times, and perhaps signifying why London is like a foreign country to most of us: As of the 2011 Census, 36.7% of London's population was foreign born. This figure excludes the 'ethnic minority' populations who were born in UK but who live in London.
This has all happened in my lifetime, but not once have I been asked about it ...... and it has lead to White European Britons being invisible in many parts of London's inner city areas.
 |
| A Brixton Market |
- With 2,998,264 residents born abroad, London has the highest foreign-born population of any city in the world.
- As of the 2011 Census, the total Asian population of London stood at 1,511,546. This is a rise of 60% from the 2001 Census, when the population stood at 947,425. Outer London has a greater Asian population than Inner London.
- London as a city is home to the single largest number of people of Bangladeshi origin outside of Bangladesh, with close to 200,000 individuals being of full Bangladeshi origin in 2007. Around 7% of London's population is of Indian origin.
- As of the 2011 Census, the total Black population of London stood at 1,088,640. This is a rise of 39% from the 2001 Census, when the population stood at 781,751. Peckham (also known as Little Lagos and Yoruba town) is home to one of the largest overseas Nigerian communities in the world; 40% of Peckham is Black African.
This has all happened in my lifetime, but not once have I been asked about it ...... and it has lead to White European Britons being invisible in many parts of London's inner city areas.
Friday, 15 March 2013
More Labour Immigration Lies
It's laughable how the Labour Party still try to pretend that 'mass immigration'
hasn't been a disaster ..... Yvette Cooper will admit that Labour 'has not always got
it right on immigration' - (How about never?), and that it should be "fair for all"
- (How about fair for the indigenous population, not to the immigrants?), and that her party hasn't always been "ready to talk about problems" ... not once admitting that it was actually a deliberate act of social vandalism intended to change Britain forever.
However it now says that it gets it (shutting the stable gates after the horse has bolted), and will say it knows that it "that needs to change". This will not mean a "move to the right" she argued - but will be an effort to distinguish between "immigration that works and immigration that doesn't .... as Ed Milliband has said, we know Labour got some things wrong on immigration in government."
She even claims that "We will support the government where it introduces sensible policies and we will point out where they are getting things wrong. But we won't enter an arms race of rhetoric on immigration - and we hope the prime minister won't either. That's not honest, or good for Britain." So in other words, they still want to control and set the agenda, and declare parts of the subject as out of bounds, and beyond debate.
Of course we all know that part of the current reduction in net migration by 72,000 since the election, has been caused by more Britons leaving the UK or choosing not to return, as well as a drop of 38,000 in students coming to study in the UK, is partially achieved by ever more white Britons fleeing the UK.
But she can't even be honest about that, merely adding that "Few think the answer to Britain's immigration challenges is to persuade more Brits to go away."
Laughable ... as mentioned earlier 'white flight' is a direct result of a Labour Party decision to let rip with immigration as a matter of policy in the 1990's ..... a decision to "open up the UK to mass migration". One that Labour Government Ministers were 'reluctant' to discuss such a move publicly, for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote". Andrew Neather, a former adviser to PM Tony Blair, and Home Secretaries Jack Straw and David Blunkett, has admitted publicly that it was a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity".
The Tory Immigration Minister, Mark Harper, responding to Ms Cooper's comments, said that "I don't think I heard an apology for Labour letting immigration get out of control while they were in power. We saw net migration of 2.2 million when they were in power." ..... many of these were semi skilled third world immigrants, many of whom actually dislike us and our culture.
UKIP waits in the wings for the wary ............
However it now says that it gets it (shutting the stable gates after the horse has bolted), and will say it knows that it "that needs to change". This will not mean a "move to the right" she argued - but will be an effort to distinguish between "immigration that works and immigration that doesn't .... as Ed Milliband has said, we know Labour got some things wrong on immigration in government."
She even claims that "We will support the government where it introduces sensible policies and we will point out where they are getting things wrong. But we won't enter an arms race of rhetoric on immigration - and we hope the prime minister won't either. That's not honest, or good for Britain." So in other words, they still want to control and set the agenda, and declare parts of the subject as out of bounds, and beyond debate.
Of course we all know that part of the current reduction in net migration by 72,000 since the election, has been caused by more Britons leaving the UK or choosing not to return, as well as a drop of 38,000 in students coming to study in the UK, is partially achieved by ever more white Britons fleeing the UK.
But she can't even be honest about that, merely adding that "Few think the answer to Britain's immigration challenges is to persuade more Brits to go away."
Laughable ... as mentioned earlier 'white flight' is a direct result of a Labour Party decision to let rip with immigration as a matter of policy in the 1990's ..... a decision to "open up the UK to mass migration". One that Labour Government Ministers were 'reluctant' to discuss such a move publicly, for fear it would alienate its "core working class vote". Andrew Neather, a former adviser to PM Tony Blair, and Home Secretaries Jack Straw and David Blunkett, has admitted publicly that it was a politically motivated attempt by ministers to radically change the country and "rub the Right's nose in diversity".
 |
| Labour Party Still Proud Of Mass Immigration |
The Tory Immigration Minister, Mark Harper, responding to Ms Cooper's comments, said that "I don't think I heard an apology for Labour letting immigration get out of control while they were in power. We saw net migration of 2.2 million when they were in power." ..... many of these were semi skilled third world immigrants, many of whom actually dislike us and our culture.
UKIP waits in the wings for the wary ............
Tuesday, 23 October 2007
Projected UK immigration and Population figures
The cat is finally out of the bag on race and immigration into the UK, although the stunning silence from our PC politicians is deafening. The Tories have said something after a day, and the liberals, well what do we expect. The Government says as little as it can apart from claiming that it's controlling the situation after ten years in power, and the BNP has to say nothing.
All this because it’s finally been confirmed, what we all have felt happening, that is that if current trends in immigration continue the population of the UK will rise to 75 million and that 30% of the population will be ‘non white’ by 2051. The Government has denied this and said it will be only 71 million, and that’s as far as they are going on the subject.
We are gradually turning our own country from a first world predominately Judeo/Christian country; into probably a Muslim threatened one. We already have shifted laws to accommodate the 3% of the population who are Muslim, so what it will be like in the UK when they are nearer 10%?
The imposition of Sharia Law beckons for areas of the country, because there is not one historical example of Muslims not imposing it when they have enough manpower to enforce it. In dome towns they will via the council be able to impose or demand it. Dhimmitude is the term for non Muslims who go like cattle to the yoke of subservience, and we are dangerously close to being a Dhimmi nation.
Have we ever been asked about this, has anyone said do you wish to completely alter the nature of your society? You can bet your sweet arse we haven’t. As on so many other issues, our much vaunted democracy has failed the general public and proved to be merely an elected dictatorship.
This subject has become impossible to discuss without being labelled a racist, or risking a criminal prosecution for incitement to racial hatred. Oddly the more pressing the problem the less you are able to discuss it, with more legal protections for even the worst of the migrants than to the native population.
One day someone is going to look back on this period and declare our society as mad, but deserving of its fate, because it just sat back and with barely a murmur allowed self serving politicians to make the biggest social engineering decision in history, the complete eradication of a basic culture. How English or British will we be with 10 million new commonwealth immigrants.
When you consider that barely 60 yrs ago this culture ruled a third of the globe, this collapse will be all the more dramatic. We may even be heading towards a civil war because ‘white flight’ to Australia and Canada will only take 5 million of the native population away from the issue.
The BNP will reap the votes of the dissatisfied, and the mainstream will ring their hand. The sheer costs of providing the additional houses, hospitals, schools, roads etc are staggering. It’s as though everyone in Belgium moved to the UK and we had to build the country from scratch.
I will leave the final words to the professor who wrote the report because you can bet that this will be buried by the news makers very quickly and certainly won’t spark the debate it deserves in a real democracy.
"The absent-minded commitment into which we have drifted, to house a further 15m people, must be the biggest unintended consequence of government policy of almost any century," he told peers.
"As it is by no means unavoidable, being almost entirely dependent upon continued immigration, it might be thought worthy of discussion. In official circles, there has been none."
Guess what, not more than a month after these figures caused such a furore, the Government announces that well, actually those figures were a massive underestimate, and in reality the UK population could be at 110m in 2081 .... 75 million was just to get us used to the idea of completely eroding Britain / England as a european nation. The new figures from the Government Actuary's Department, predict that the net population growth from immigration will probably be just short of 200,000 a year until 2021 - but adds it could peak in the near future at 300,000 a year.
Below is a Poll link to a question that allows anyone to let their thoughts be known. It’s the nearest anyone in the UK will get to having a say.
All this because it’s finally been confirmed, what we all have felt happening, that is that if current trends in immigration continue the population of the UK will rise to 75 million and that 30% of the population will be ‘non white’ by 2051. The Government has denied this and said it will be only 71 million, and that’s as far as they are going on the subject.
We are gradually turning our own country from a first world predominately Judeo/Christian country; into probably a Muslim threatened one. We already have shifted laws to accommodate the 3% of the population who are Muslim, so what it will be like in the UK when they are nearer 10%?
The imposition of Sharia Law beckons for areas of the country, because there is not one historical example of Muslims not imposing it when they have enough manpower to enforce it. In dome towns they will via the council be able to impose or demand it. Dhimmitude is the term for non Muslims who go like cattle to the yoke of subservience, and we are dangerously close to being a Dhimmi nation.
Have we ever been asked about this, has anyone said do you wish to completely alter the nature of your society? You can bet your sweet arse we haven’t. As on so many other issues, our much vaunted democracy has failed the general public and proved to be merely an elected dictatorship.
This subject has become impossible to discuss without being labelled a racist, or risking a criminal prosecution for incitement to racial hatred. Oddly the more pressing the problem the less you are able to discuss it, with more legal protections for even the worst of the migrants than to the native population.
One day someone is going to look back on this period and declare our society as mad, but deserving of its fate, because it just sat back and with barely a murmur allowed self serving politicians to make the biggest social engineering decision in history, the complete eradication of a basic culture. How English or British will we be with 10 million new commonwealth immigrants.
When you consider that barely 60 yrs ago this culture ruled a third of the globe, this collapse will be all the more dramatic. We may even be heading towards a civil war because ‘white flight’ to Australia and Canada will only take 5 million of the native population away from the issue.
The BNP will reap the votes of the dissatisfied, and the mainstream will ring their hand. The sheer costs of providing the additional houses, hospitals, schools, roads etc are staggering. It’s as though everyone in Belgium moved to the UK and we had to build the country from scratch.
I will leave the final words to the professor who wrote the report because you can bet that this will be buried by the news makers very quickly and certainly won’t spark the debate it deserves in a real democracy.
"The absent-minded commitment into which we have drifted, to house a further 15m people, must be the biggest unintended consequence of government policy of almost any century," he told peers.
"As it is by no means unavoidable, being almost entirely dependent upon continued immigration, it might be thought worthy of discussion. In official circles, there has been none."
Guess what, not more than a month after these figures caused such a furore, the Government announces that well, actually those figures were a massive underestimate, and in reality the UK population could be at 110m in 2081 .... 75 million was just to get us used to the idea of completely eroding Britain / England as a european nation. The new figures from the Government Actuary's Department, predict that the net population growth from immigration will probably be just short of 200,000 a year until 2021 - but adds it could peak in the near future at 300,000 a year.
Below is a Poll link to a question that allows anyone to let their thoughts be known. It’s the nearest anyone in the UK will get to having a say.
***************************************
This post is from the site No PC Views.
if you are viewing it elsewhere, then it has been scraped or stolen.
You may wish to view the post in its original context by visiting No PC Views (http://no-pc.blogspot.co.uk/)
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Most Visited Posts In Last 30 Days
Its a Pucking World
Dreamberry Wine Cover
