Many many years ago, in a different life and location ....
![]() |
| Comparison Of National Health Systems. |
.... I was given somewhat of a lecture on comparative health systems by a US I.T. worker.
They were arguing that 'socialist healthcare,' as they insisted on calling the UK's National Health System (NHS), was both poor and expensive, compared to the quality of care provided by the US with its mixture of state Medicare (the federal health insurance program for people age 65 plus, and some younger people with disabilities) and private health insurance.
I also understand that the US also has a Veterans Health Administration, which is an ad-mix of state and patient contributions health care for ex-services personnel - a big thing in the USA where the size of the armed forces make this a benefit to a sizeable number of people. But this didn't feature in the discussion at the time.
Now, whilst I was happy to concede that in some circumstances the care given by some private providers may be better than the local NHS hospital, I still argued that not having to pay for each treatment via variable insurance contributions and coverage, plus often co-payments (as surcharges are defined), would take away the stress having to find money on the spot. I also added that a health system covered by taxes, meant everyone got coverage, and still allowed those that could afford it to go private via schemes such as BUPA (other schemes are available now, but not back then).
I also pointed out that at that time, the French (mix state and insurance) was rated better for treatment and cost than the US system, and was financed by employee and employer contributions, as well as taxes on a variety of revenues. All essential medical services required cost sharing, via coinsurance, co-payments, or balance billing with people buying a modest private complementary insurance to reduce out-of-pocket costs.
Obviously we didn't agree, but they did acknowledge that while they were in the UK, not having to pay for health insurance was something they appreciated. I didn't have access back then to the figures in the top illustration, that indicate the the US system is nowhere near the best of class and indeed US health care is considered an individual responsibility, and not the human right its considered in many developed countries.. As highlighted in Red (and blue for nearest other) the US often compares poorly with others in both cost and outcomes.
- In 2021 the US has the lowest percentage of the population (along with Costa Rica) covered for a core set of health services.
- In 2022 the US spent by far the greatest percentage of GDP at least 4% more than the nearest spender (Germany), and on average 5% more than those countries providing 100% coverage of those core services to their citizens.
- In 2021 the US had the 2nd lowest Average Life Expectancy at Birth (76.4 yrs) with only Italy lower at 74.3 years.
- In 2021 the US had the 2nd highest Infant Mortality Rates per 1,000 live births (5.4) behind Costa Rica with 8.7.
- In 2020 the US had the 2nd highest Maternal Mortality Ratio (deaths per 100,000 Live Births) at 21.1 behind only Costa Rica at 22.0
On other measurements the US fares poorly as well:
- Compared with peer countries, the U.S. spends twice as much on health care but as indicated in the comparison above, has worse health outcomes in many instances.
- US life expectancy at birth is 77.5 years, almost five years shorter than the average life expectancy in other high-income countries.
- The US has the highest chronic disease burden, highest suicide rates, and highest rate of avoidable deaths.
- Its a fact that no one is entitled to health care in the U.S. as a right, not even children, it has to be bought. Even emergency treatment after being shot for example, is not free (hospitals are obliged to give stabilisation care regardless of ability to pay, but after that you need to pay somehow).
- 92 percent of Americans actually have some form of health insurance, but in many cases the coverage is often insufficient. As a result: 41 percent of American adults owe medical debt; 25 per cent have delayed medical treatment due to cost, and 62 per cent of filed bankruptcies are related to medical debt.
- Even the cost of medicines are exorbitantly high in the US (because its paid by insurance, and the prices are unregulated by the US government). In some cases the costs are up to 256 per cent higher in the U.S. than in other neighbouring countries, prompting many Americans to either skip their medication, navigate informal markets (such as prescription churning), and accessing prescription drugs through other countries (often by smuggling them from Mexico or Canada).
Roll on a few decades from that discussion, and I had had a serious health issues, of which one was a stage 4 Oesophageal (US esophageal) cancer, which in 2024 prices would cost the following to treat in the USA:
- The average cost of surgery for esophageal cancer in the United States is $30,000 (£23,524) - (American Life Fund said $20k to $50k - £15,687 to £39,208).
- Radiation therapy: Uses high-energy beams to kill cancer cells, and costs an average of $50,000 (£39,208).
- Chemotherapy: Uses drugs to kill cancer cells, and costs an average of $100,000 (£78,416)
It was too dangerous for me to have radiation therapy (too close to other organs), so I had 6 back to back chemotherapy sessions (spaced 3 weeks apart), and then the operation .... so priced from above list I would assume at least $130,000 (£101,933) worth of treatment required to save my life.
So the arrest of 26 year old Ivy League graduate Luigi Mangione for the murder of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson in New York City with the words "deny", "defend" and "depose" written on the empty gun shell casings found at the scene of Mr Thompson's murder, is perhaps not entirely unsurprising.
These bullets are a reference to the "three Ds of USA medical insurance" - tactics often used by insurance companies to reject payment claims by patients, in America's complex trillion-dollar healthcare industry (an array of providers, for profit and not-for-profit companies, insurance giants, and federal government programmes).
![]() |
| UnitedHealthcare Protests |
Apparently there had already been a number protests outside UnitedHealthcare buildings, such as its Minnesota head office in the past against the insurance firm's policies and denial of patient claims. The "Prior authorisation" clause in all these health insurance schemes or policies allows these companies to review all physician recommended treatments before agreeing to pay for them. These denials of care can be appealed but they are a lengthy process that's incredibly difficult to win and usually aren't.
There is apparently a large pool of anger at the US's increasingly expensive healthcare, that is often pricing many people out of coverage (especially for expensive treatments), and Brian Thompson's LinkedIn history revealed that many customers were angry about denied claims. One woman responded to a post that the chief executive had made about his firm's work on making drugs more affordable.
"I have stage 4 metastatic lung cancer," she wrote. "We've just left [UnitedHealthcare] because of all the denials for my meds. Every month there is a different reason for the denial." .... as you can imagine, it was this post, that caused me to think about that long ago conversation, and my more recent cancer .... apparently as a stage 4 patient, it appears I would have been denied treatment by UnitedHealthcare if I had lived in the USA ... instead, in the UK, I was treated and survived, and I am a least 6 years further on, despite the odds initially being stacked against me ... with no medical bills around my neck!
No one can condone murder, and the company stated that it had received many messages of support from "patients, consumers, health care professionals, associations, government officials and other caring people". But the BBC reported that on-line the response to his murder was at best mixed. One commonly posted comment was "thoughts and prior authorisations", instead of the phrase "thoughts and prayers," and a clear reference to claim rejections through that clause. While some across the political divide celebrated his killing and many more told tales of rejected health claims.
Research by the Commonwealth Fund (a healthcare research foundation), found that 45% of insured US working-age adults were charged for something in a medical claim that they thought should have been either free or covered by their insurance.
While 17% (1 in 6) of the respondents said their insurer had denied coverage for a medical treatment that was recommended by their doctor. While an analysis of a sample of comments on X after Mr Mangione's arrest for the murder, carried out by market research firm OneCliq found the vast majority (four-fifths) contained criticism of the healthcare system. Indeed such is the anger against the health insurers that Mr Mangione's X account has also garnered more than 400,000 new followers since the shooting.
Sara Collins, a senior scholar at The Commonwealth Fund said "We find high rates of people saying that their healthcare costs are unaffordable, across all insurance types, even (government-funded) Medicaid and Medicare. People accumulate medical debt because they can't pay their bills. This is unique to the United States. We truly have a medical debt crisis."
The RAND Corporation a non-profit think tank, reported that health insurance premiums are on average $25,000 (£19,600) per family ... effectively a tax on health. But health policy foundation KFF found that while most insured adults (81%), still rated their health insurance as "excellent" or "good," around two-thirds of Americans said the insurance companies deserve "a lot" of blame for high healthcare costs.
But all the evidence shows that while everything might seem fine with their health plan, until they get sick and need their plan, and then start finding things not covered or treatment denied, meaning that many people face out-of-pocket costs, which could easily be in the thousands or tens of thousands of dollars, which they can be paying too the grave (often with education debts as its companion debt).
Mr Montes-Irueste of People's Action (campaigning for US healthcare reform), said they rejected violence but that "We have a balkanised and broken healthcare system, which is why there are very strong feelings being expressed right now by folks who are experiencing that broken system in various different ways."


Trumps "big beautiful budget bill" for millionaires currently in the US Senate could cut health insurance coverage for nearly 12 million Americans.
ReplyDeleteThe Land of the free is now more free of health care. Ironically its the working class Trump voters who are most likely to lose out.
I saw that figure repeated as the number expected to die worldwide as a result of USAID being closed .... you can't deny Trumps impact will be felt for many years after he leaves office. I am not sure what he hopes his legacy will be, but so far its not looking great. Thanks for the comment.
DeleteThe US system is so broken that the US paid nearly three times as much for medications as did comparable countries in 2022.
ReplyDeleteThe comparable countries are in Europe where Trump has imposed a 15% tariff on drug imports and he has now threatened US Pharma with legislation to make them charge “Most Favored Nation” prices for up to 50 drugs that are administered in doctors’ offices ... he had tried this in his previous term.
These same companies sell the same drugs in the EU at far cheaper prices, and he wants the same deal for US clients of Medicare and insurance companies etc.
The pharma companies are resisting but in any case US drug prices are driven by prices they pay are largely governed by the US’s complex health system, which includes manufacturers, insurers and pharmacy benefit managers, known as PBMs all making profits in the supply chain.
Trump is also suggesting that drugs be sold direct to the public thus bypassing the supply chain that bumps the prices.
It will be interesting to see if Trump can break practices that have operated like this since at least 1945.
Katie. Its hard to see US health practises being altered significantly by Trump ... US pharma makes its money in the US via the health insurance system. If they don't get it there then there is no incentive to develop new drugs. As you point out the drug prices customers pay are largely governed by the US’s complex health system which would require a complete overhaul to fix/alter. Thanks for the comment.
DeleteKatie. You may be interested in Trumps plan to offer Obama Care 'copper' plans that can save between 20% less than 'bronze' plans and 60% less than 'gold' plans.
DeleteHe plans to make all US citizens exempt and able to buy the plans. The quid pro quote is higher out of pocket costs in return for the lower premiums.
So cheaper when you don't need treatment (the majority of the time) and more expensive when you do need treatment (the minority of the time).
https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/trump-unlocks-cheaper-healthcare-plans-could-save-american-families-thousands-dollars
I can't really comment as this beyond my knowledge of the US health system. Thanks for the information.
DeleteTrumps plan is described here:
Deletehttps://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/30/politics/pfizer-drug-prices-trump?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc&recs_exp=up-next-article-end&tenant_id=popular.article.en
But to say its a Trump plan that he flashes as a trumph (for him) but is short of actual results.
It seems to be reliant on consumers buying drugs direct by cash, but as they use insurance policies the only savers really are the US health dept via some lower medicaid bills. Those insured don't pay for medications as such, they pay via insurance so will not pay out cash to buy expensive drugs. It looks like the usual smoke and mirrors policies much like his Gaza peace plan which Hamas will reject and Israel will ignore.
In this case the insurance costs won't come down and many of the drugs being offered are rarely prescribed in the US. The only people who theoretically could benefit are the uninsured but they are uninsured because they can't afford it, or the medicines.
Anyway for those interested the link explains the scheme and the pros and cons.
Oh and here's the explanation of President Trump's mathematics. His claims to reduce drug prices in the US by 500 yo 1000 per cent make particularly entertaining reading as they give an insight into his lack of grasp of facts.
DeleteYou can only reduce something by 100 per cent to zero. Anything else is nonsense.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/09/23/politics/fact-check-drug-prices-trump
I am assuming the last two comments are from the same person as the first wasn't published until the 2nd had been received. I watched a TV show recently in which I think they highlighted close to 100 false facts spouted by President Trump, so his lack of mathematical understanding is no great surprise compared with other facts he apparently has some issues with.
DeleteI confess I am not convinced that the ordinary American citizen will notice a Ha'penth of difference in their medical insurance charges, and that as the vast majority of prescription medicines are paid for via private insurance or Medicaid, then this will result in a limited saving for Medicaid (i.e Federal and US states medical bills as part of Medicaid), and extra profits for the medical insurance companies, who will save money on some prescription medicines, but not pass the majority of those savings via reduced medical insurance charge. A possibility which will no doubt irk Mr Luigi Mangione and others like him, who think the US system is unfair.
As for the rest of the world paying more .... well that depends on whether there are alternatives to US manufactured drugs .... I suspect that there will soon be some if there aren't any now, especially if US manufacturers pump up prices, or Trump tariffs every drug that's not US manufactured.
Thanks for the comments and links, I am sure that Katie (if she ever comes back to look at her comment) will be enlightened by the many replies to that comment.
In a somewhat strange twist, the New York judge for the murder case has dismissed both the terrorism AND the 1st Degree Murder charges against Luigi Mangione. Its odd how it can be only considered 2nd degree murder.
ReplyDeleteI've no doubt President Trump will point to this once again as evidence that Democrat run cities and states are soft on crime. However as Mangione also faces federal charges that could result in the death penalty he's likely to go on trial for those right after his New York trial.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cj4y2p8qq5qo
I can understand the dropping of the terrorism charge, I never thought of the killing in that light, but the first degree murder charge seemed likely as it took planning to perform the killing and escape. Thanks for the comment.
DeleteYou all might be interested in the fact that due to Trumps 'BIg Beautiful Tax Bill' removing tax credits on health care costs, many citizens face very large health insurance premium rises
Deletehttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cnvee260n8eo
Yes its become the cause of the government shutdown. Thanks for the comment.
DeleteUS health care costs expected to have its biggest rise since the last time Trump was in power and tried to reverse the Affordable Care Act.
ReplyDeleteTrumps supporters who are not in high income employment will suffer worst.
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/aca-marketplace-obamacare-health-insurance-premiums-2026-increase-sticker-shock/
Claire, its hard to work out how Trump thinks removing the healthcare subsidies for the Affordable Care Act (ACA) (the cause of the current frozen us government freeze as Democrats try to get the healthcare subsidies extended restored) and redirecting what ACA subsidies remain after the cuts, from insurers to direct payments for individuals to purchase 'better healthcare' will result in lower costs or better health care. Its estimated that about 24 million people currently buy health insurance through the marketplace, the majority of whom used to receive the tax credits to lower the monthly price.
DeleteThe changes currently being fought over will mean that without the additional credits, the monthly cost could rise by 114% on average. Some experts suggest that about seven million people are expected to stop buying health insurance through the ACA marketplace if those tax credits end. Of those, somewhere between four and five million could possibly lose their healthcare coverage altogether, simply because they won't be able to find other means to afford coverage.
As you say these are likely to include many MAGA/Trump supporters which is somewhat ironic. Thanks for the comment. I expect this story will run.
The US press will not be letting this isdue go, because the chickens are coming home to roost in the form of health insurance premiums, which have risen significantly for some people.
ReplyDeleteDonald Trump and the Republican party have made a tactical mistake on this issue, because rises of several hundreds of dollars is largely unaffordable for white lower income MAGA supporters and those who voted for him despite MAGA. The black population affected, are mostly Democrat voters, so are probably not of concern to the Republicans in their current guise.
Shooting your own supporters in such a public way is normally a dumb move but such is Trumps support in certain groups that many will still approve the changes right up until their own family are affected.
https://edition.cnn.com/2025/11/09/politics/aca-enrollment-premiums-increase-impact?iid=cnn_buildContentRecirc_end_recirc&recs_exp=most-popular-article-end&tenant_id=popular.en
Hello and welcome back Claire. Firstly I hope that you are not personally adversely affected by all this.
DeleteYes as Bernie Sanders remarked the measure "raises healthcare premiums for over 20 million Americans by doubling, and in some cases tripling or quadrupling them. People can’t afford that when we are already paying the highest prices in the world for healthcare .... it paves the way for 15 million people to be thrown off of Medicaid. Studies show that will mean some 50,000 Americans will die every year unnecessarily. And all of that was done to give a trillion dollars in tax breaks to the 1%."
You have to wonder why the Republicans would risk losing so many blue collar votes in the mid-terms next year and next Presidential elections. Thanks for the comments
The stories keep coming.
ReplyDeletehttps://www.cbsnews.com/news/medicare-2026-premium-part-b-hike-social-security-cola/
Hello Claire again. Its an issue that I understand is now panicking the Republicans as well, but they want Obama Care gone, so how they square the circle will be the problem for Trump. Thanks for the comment.
ReplyDelete