Headline of the last few weeks was for me ......
Actually, it relates to the demise of the 'Star Wars' actor
Richard LeParmentier who as you may have easily guessed played one of,
if not the first character killed by Darth Vader in the 1977 movie 'Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope'. He was of course the character Admiral Conan Antonio Motti, who
extolled the virtues of the Empire's 'Death Star' space station, and who
poured scorn on Vader's "sad devotion to that ancient Jedi religion".
"Darth Vader's 'first victim' dies"
 |
| Admiral Conan Antonio Motti v Darth Vader - No Contest |
What can you say to that ...... finally my hero and also 'Anti Hero', makes the news, and I can post on him once again.
Big mistake buddy, Vader found his vocal "lack of faith. Disturbing" and his diatribe brings a swift rebuke from the masked Vader, who uses "The Force" to place a choke hold on his throat, and leave him slumped on the table, ostensibly dead. .... mind you with the headline "'first victim' dies, only coming up 35 yrs after he, he may only have been very very poorly, for a very long long time .... ago.
Ah those were the days ........ you knew who was who, and what was what in a universe far far away. And the biggest WHO was Darth Vader ..... The Man!
Ah those were the days ........ you knew who was who, and what was what in a universe far far away. And the biggest WHO was Darth Vader ..... The Man!
 |
| Darth Vader - Warrior |
No comments:
Post a Comment
All comments are welcomed, or even just thanks if you enjoyed the post. But please make any comment relevant to the post it appears under. Off topic comments will be blocked or removed.
Moderation is on for older posts to stop spamming and comments that are off topic or inappropriate from being posted .... comments are reviewed within 48 hours. I don't block normal comments that are on topic and not inappropriate. Vexatious comments that may cause upset to other commentators, or that are attempting to espouse a particular wider political view, are reviewed before acceptance. But a certain amount of debate around a post topic is accepted, as long as it remains generally on topic and is not an attempt to become sounding board for some other cause.
Final decision on all comments is held by the blog author and is final.
Comments are always monitored for bad or abusive language, and or illegal statements i.e. overtly racist or sexist content. Spam is not tolerated and is removed.
Commentaires ne sont surveillés que pour le mauvais ou abusif langue ou déclarations illégales ie contenu ouvertement raciste ou sexiste. Spam ne est pas toléré et est éliminé.